FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal Ta-2.5W vs Type C Thermocouple (W5Re/W26Re)

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal Ta-2.5W and Type C Thermocouple (W5Re/W26Re) are both refractory metal grades. Type C Thermocouple (W5Re/W26Re) is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,700 MPa (247 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for Ta-2.5W, about 5.5 times as much; tensile strength follows at 2,000 MPa (290 ksi) vs 415 MPa (60.2 ksi). In exchange, Ta-2.5W is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 4% for Type C Thermocouple (W5Re/W26Re), and Type C Thermocouple (W5Re/W26Re) is harder (560 HV vs 120 HV). Ta-2.5W is lighter (16.7 g/cm³ vs 19.5 g/cm³ for Type C Thermocouple (W5Re/W26Re)) and Type C Thermocouple (W5Re/W26Re) is stiffer (395 GPa vs 200 GPa). On the shop floor, Ta-2.5W machines more easily (poor vs not recommended), Ta-2.5W welds better (very good vs poor), and Type C Thermocouple (W5Re/W26Re) sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than Ta-2.5W (specialty, $$$$$).

Ta-2.5WChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Type C Thermocouple (W5Re/W26Re)Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Ta-2.5W vs Type C Thermocouple (W5Re/W26Re): properties

Ta-2.5WType C Thermocouple (W5Re/W26Re)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
395 GPa57.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
152 GPa22 Msi

Bulk Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
305 GPa44.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

415 MPa60.2 ksi
2,000 MPa290 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

310 MPa45 ksi
1,700 MPa247 ksi

Elongation at Break

28%
4%

Reduction in Area

70%
—

Compressive Strength

320 MPa46.4 ksi
—

Shear Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
—

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

185 MPa26.8 ksi
—

Hardness, Brinell

115 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

68 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

120 HV
560 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

16.7 g/cm³0.6 lb/in³
19.5 g/cm³0.7 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

3,030°C5,486 °F
3,150°C5,702 °F

Liquidus Temperature

3,040°C5,504 °F
3,250°C5,882 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

54 W/m·K31.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
70 W/m·K40.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

140 J/kg·K0.03 BTU/lb·°F
138 J/kg·K0.03 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

6.5 µm/m·K3.6 µin/in·°F
4.7 µm/m·K2.6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

200 J/g86 BTU/lb
275 J/g118 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
2,320°C4,208 °F

Min Service Temperature

-269°C-452 °F
0°C32 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9.9 % IACS
9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.75×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.89 µΩ·in
2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.87 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.05 V
—

Corrosion Resistance

97 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

18 / 100
8 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

18%
5%

Weldability

80 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
10 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

65 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

4,400 MJ/kg1,891,661 BTU/lb
500 MJ/kg214,962 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

260 kg CO₂/kg
35 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

20%
10%

Embodied Water

—
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

25 kN·m/kg
103 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

12 MN·m/kg
20.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

240 kJ/m³
3,658 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

23.1 mm²/s
26 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

17
75

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTa-2.5WType C Thermocouple (W5Re/W26Re)

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityTa-2.5WType C Thermocouple (W5Re/W26Re)
Default conditionVacuum Annealed—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Ta-2.5W vs Type C Thermocouple (W5Re/W26Re) — frequently asked

Is Type C Thermocouple (W5Re/W26Re) stronger than Ta-2.5W?

Yes. Type C Thermocouple (W5Re/W26Re) has a typical yield strength of 1,700 MPa (247 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for Ta-2.5W — about 5.5 times as much. Tensile strength is 2,000 MPa (290 ksi) vs 415 MPa (60.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Ta-2.5W or Type C Thermocouple (W5Re/W26Re)?

Type C Thermocouple (W5Re/W26Re) is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while Ta-2.5W is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Ta-2.5W or Type C Thermocouple (W5Re/W26Re)?

Ta-2.5W. Its machinability rates poor (18/100) against not recommended (8/100) for Type C Thermocouple (W5Re/W26Re); for welding the order is Ta-2.5W first (very good, 80/100) then Type C Thermocouple (W5Re/W26Re) (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Ta-2.5W and Type C Thermocouple (W5Re/W26Re) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.