FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal FS-85 vs Ta-2.5W

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal FS-85 and Ta-2.5W are both refractory metal grades. FS-85 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for Ta-2.5W, about 55% more; tensile strength follows at 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) vs 415 MPa (60.2 ksi). In exchange, Ta-2.5W is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 22% for FS-85, and FS-85 is harder (208 HB vs 115 HB). FS-85 is lighter (10.6 g/cm³ vs 16.7 g/cm³ for Ta-2.5W) and Ta-2.5W is stiffer (200 GPa vs 138 GPa). On the shop floor, Ta-2.5W welds better (80 vs 70 out of 100) and FS-85 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than Ta-2.5W (specialty, $$$$$).

FS-85Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Ta-2.5WChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

FS-85 vs Ta-2.5W: properties

FS-85Ta-2.5W

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

138 GPa20 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

51 GPa7.4 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

155 GPa22.5 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

585 MPa84.8 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
28%

Reduction in Area

60%
70%

Compressive Strength

490 MPa71.1 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Shear Strength

350 MPa50.8 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

260 MPa37.7 ksi
185 MPa26.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

80 MPa·√m72.8 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

208 HB
115 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

96 HRB
68 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

18 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

220 HV
120 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.35

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

10.6 g/cm³0.38 lb/in³
16.7 g/cm³0.6 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

2,590°C4,694 °F
3,030°C5,486 °F

Liquidus Temperature

2,620°C4,748 °F
3,040°C5,504 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
54 W/m·K31.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

215 J/kg·K0.05 BTU/lb·°F
140 J/kg·K0.03 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

7 µm/m·K3.9 µin/in·°F
6.5 µm/m·K3.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,500°C2,732 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-269°C-452 °F

Latent Heat of Fusion

—
200 J/g86 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.4 % IACS
9.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m19.7 µΩ·in
1.75×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.89 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
97 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
18 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
18%

Weldability

70 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
65 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
80 / 100

Castability

—
25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

900 MJ/kg386,931 BTU/lb
4,400 MJ/kg1,891,661 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

60 kg CO₂/kg
260 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

25%
20%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

55 kN·m/kg
25 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13 MN·m/kg
12 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

835 kJ/m³
240 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

17.6 mm²/s
23.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
17

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTa-2.5WFS-85

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityFS-85Ta-2.5W
Default condition—Vacuum Annealed
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

FS-85 vs Ta-2.5W — frequently asked

Is FS-85 stronger than Ta-2.5W?

Yes. FS-85 has a typical yield strength of 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for Ta-2.5W — about 55% more. Tensile strength is 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) vs 415 MPa (60.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, FS-85 or Ta-2.5W?

FS-85 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while Ta-2.5W is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, FS-85 or Ta-2.5W?

FS-85, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 25/100 against 18/100 for Ta-2.5W; for welding the order is Ta-2.5W first (very good, 80/100) then FS-85 (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in FS-85 and Ta-2.5W side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.