FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal R02002 vs TZM

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal R02002 and TZM are both refractory metal grades. TZM is the stronger of the two: yield strength 760 MPa (110 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for R02002, about 3.2 times as much; tensile strength follows at 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi). In exchange, R02002 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 15% for TZM, and TZM is harder (255 HB vs 165 HB). TZM is lighter (10.22 g/cm³ vs 13.31 g/cm³ for R02002) and TZM is stiffer (315 GPa vs 138 GPa). On the shop floor, TZM machines more easily (fair vs poor), R02002 welds better (very good vs poor), and R02002 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than TZM (specialty, $$$$$).

R02002Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

TZMChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

R02002 vs TZM: properties

R02002TZM

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

138 GPa20 Msi
315 GPa45.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

55 GPa8 Msi
122 GPa17.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
260 GPa37.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
15%

Reduction in Area

40%
45%

Shear Strength

290 MPa42.1 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

165 HB
255 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

88 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

170 HV
270 HV

Compressive Strength

—
800 MPa116 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

—
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
8 J5.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
26 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

13.31 g/cm³0.48 lb/in³
10.22 g/cm³0.37 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

2,233°C4,051 °F
2,617°C4,743 °F

Liquidus Temperature

2,233°C4,051 °F
2,623°C4,753 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

23 W/m·K13.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
118 W/m·K68.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

144 J/kg·K0.03 BTU/lb·°F
272 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

5.9 µm/m·K3.3 µin/in·°F
5.3 µm/m·K2.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

152 J/g65.3 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
1,300°C2,372 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
20°C68 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

5.2 % IACS
30 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.31×10⁻⁷ Ω·m13 µΩ·in
5.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.28 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
45 / 100

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.2 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
40%

Weldability

70 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

2,000 MJ/kg859,846 BTU/lb
380 MJ/kg163,371 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

130 kg CO₂/kg
26 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

20%
25%

Embodied Water

—
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

34 kN·m/kg
88 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.4 MN·m/kg
30.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

209 kJ/m³
917 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

12 mm²/s
42.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
64

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTZMR02002

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityR02002TZM
Default condition—Stress Relieved
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

R02002 vs TZM — frequently asked

Is TZM stronger than R02002?

Yes. TZM has a typical yield strength of 760 MPa (110 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for R02002 — about 3.2 times as much. Tensile strength is 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, R02002 or TZM?

R02002 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while TZM is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, R02002 or TZM?

TZM. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (30/100) for R02002; for welding the order is R02002 first (very good, 70/100) then TZM (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in R02002 and TZM side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.