FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal Pure Ta vs T-111

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal Pure Ta and T-111 are both refractory metal grades. T-111 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for Pure Ta, about 144% more; tensile strength follows at 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi). In exchange, Pure Ta is the more ductile: elongation 38% versus 25% for T-111, and T-111 is harder (220 HB vs 95 HB). T-111 is stiffer (200 GPa vs 186 GPa) and T-111 runs hotter in service (2,200°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, T-111 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than Pure Ta (specialty, $$$$$).

Pure TaChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

T-111Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Pure Ta vs T-111: properties

Pure TaT-111

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

186 GPa27 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
74 GPa10.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
210 GPa30.5 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.35

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

38%
25%

Reduction in Area

75%
60%

Shear Strength

170 MPa24.7 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

140 MPa20.3 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

95 HB
220 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

52 HRB
99 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

95 HV
235 HV

Compressive Strength

—
425 MPa61.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
110 J81.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
21 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

16.6 g/cm³0.6 lb/in³
16.8 g/cm³0.61 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

2,996°C5,425 °F
3,030°C5,486 °F

Liquidus Temperature

2,996°C5,425 °F
3,055°C5,531 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

57.5 W/m·K33.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

202 J/g86.8 BTU/lb
195 J/g83.8 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
2,200°C3,992 °F

Min Service Temperature

-269°C-452 °F
-253°C-423 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 140 J/kg·K0.03 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 6.5 µm/m·K3.6 µin/in·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

12.8 % IACS
6.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.35×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.31 µΩ·in
2.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.84 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

97 / 100
93 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

22 / 100
25 / 100

Weldability

72 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

92 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

10 / 100
30 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20% · Brazeability / Solderability 55 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

4,200 MJ/kg1,805,677 BTU/lb
4,400 MJ/kg1,891,661 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

260 kg CO₂/kg
265 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

700 L/kg83.9 gal/lb
—

Typical Recycled Content

25%
20%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

15 kN·m/kg
33 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

11.2 MN·m/kg
11.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

78 kJ/m³
431 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

24.7 mm²/s
17.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
18

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePure TaT-111

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPure TaT-111
Default conditionVacuum Annealed—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Pure Ta vs T-111 — frequently asked

Is T-111 stronger than Pure Ta?

Yes. T-111 has a typical yield strength of 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for Pure Ta — about 144% more. Tensile strength is 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Pure Ta or T-111?

T-111 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while Pure Ta is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, Pure Ta or T-111?

T-111. Its weldability rates very good (80/100) against very good (72/100) for Pure Ta.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Pure Ta and T-111 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.