Refractory Metal FS-85 vs T-111
Refractory Metal · grade comparison
Refractory Metal FS-85 and T-111 are both refractory metal grades. FS-85 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) for T-111, about 16% more; tensile strength follows at 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) vs 550 MPa (79.8 ksi). In exchange, T-111 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 22% for FS-85, and T-111 is harder (220 HB vs 208 HB). FS-85 is lighter (10.6 g/cm³ vs 16.8 g/cm³ for T-111) and T-111 is stiffer (200 GPa vs 138 GPa). On the shop floor, T-111 welds better (80 vs 70 out of 100).
FS-85Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.
T-111Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.
FS-85 vs T-111: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all refractory metal grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all refractory metal grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Compressive Strength
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Fracture Toughness (K_IC)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell B
Hardness, Rockwell C
Hardness, Vickers
Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.35 · Reduction in Area 60%
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Min Service Temperature
Latent Heat of Fusion
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Weldability
Polishability
Castability
Same in both: Machinability 25 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20% · Formability (cold) 70 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 55 / 100
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Typical Recycled Content
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | FS-85 | T-111 |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
FS-85 vs T-111 — frequently asked
Is FS-85 stronger than T-111?
Yes. FS-85 has a typical yield strength of 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) for T-111 — about 16% more. Tensile strength is 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) vs 550 MPa (79.8 ksi).
Which is cheaper, FS-85 or T-111?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which welds better, FS-85 or T-111?
T-111. Its weldability rates very good (80/100) against very good (70/100) for FS-85.
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in FS-85 and T-111 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.