FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal FS-85 vs Pure Ta

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal FS-85 and Pure Ta are both refractory metal grades. FS-85 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for Pure Ta, about 182% more; tensile strength follows at 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi). In exchange, Pure Ta is the more ductile: elongation 38% versus 22% for FS-85, and FS-85 is harder (208 HB vs 95 HB). FS-85 is lighter (10.6 g/cm³ vs 16.6 g/cm³ for Pure Ta) and Pure Ta is stiffer (186 GPa vs 138 GPa). On the shop floor, FS-85 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than Pure Ta (specialty, $$$$$).

FS-85Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Pure TaChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

FS-85 vs Pure Ta: properties

FS-85Pure Ta

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

138 GPa20 Msi
186 GPa27 Msi

Shear Modulus

51 GPa7.4 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Bulk Modulus

155 GPa22.5 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

585 MPa84.8 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
38%

Reduction in Area

60%
75%

Compressive Strength

490 MPa71.1 ksi
—

Shear Strength

350 MPa50.8 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

260 MPa37.7 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

80 MPa·√m72.8 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

208 HB
95 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

96 HRB
52 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

18 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

220 HV
95 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

10.6 g/cm³0.38 lb/in³
16.6 g/cm³0.6 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

2,590°C4,694 °F
2,996°C5,425 °F

Liquidus Temperature

2,620°C4,748 °F
2,996°C5,425 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
57.5 W/m·K33.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

215 J/kg·K0.05 BTU/lb·°F
140 J/kg·K0.03 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

7 µm/m·K3.9 µin/in·°F
6.5 µm/m·K3.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,500°C2,732 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-269°C-452 °F

Latent Heat of Fusion

—
202 J/g86.8 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.4 % IACS
12.8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m19.7 µΩ·in
1.35×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.31 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
97 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
22 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
72 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
92 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
10 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 20% · Brazeability / Solderability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

900 MJ/kg386,931 BTU/lb
4,200 MJ/kg1,805,677 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

60 kg CO₂/kg
260 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
700 L/kg83.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

55 kN·m/kg
15 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13 MN·m/kg
11.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

835 kJ/m³
78 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

17.6 mm²/s
24.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePure TaFS-85

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityFS-85Pure Ta
Default condition—Vacuum Annealed
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

FS-85 vs Pure Ta — frequently asked

Is FS-85 stronger than Pure Ta?

Yes. FS-85 has a typical yield strength of 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for Pure Ta — about 182% more. Tensile strength is 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, FS-85 or Pure Ta?

FS-85 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while Pure Ta is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose FS-85 over Pure Ta?

Pick FS-85 when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint. Pick Pure Ta when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in FS-85 and Pure Ta side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.