FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal Pure Ta vs T-222

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal Pure Ta and T-222 are both refractory metal grades. T-222 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for Pure Ta, about 176% more; tensile strength follows at 600 MPa (87 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi). In exchange, Pure Ta is the more ductile: elongation 38% versus 22% for T-222, and T-222 is harder (250 HB vs 95 HB). T-222 is stiffer (200 GPa vs 186 GPa) and T-222 runs hotter in service (2,400°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, T-222 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than Pure Ta (specialty, $$$$$).

Pure TaChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

T-222Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Pure Ta vs T-222: properties

Pure TaT-222

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

186 GPa27 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
195 GPa28.3 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.34
0.33

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
600 MPa87 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

170 MPa24.7 ksi
470 MPa68.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

38%
22%

Reduction in Area

75%
55%

Shear Strength

170 MPa24.7 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

140 MPa20.3 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

95 HB
250 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

52 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

95 HV
265 HV

Compressive Strength

—
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
80 MPa·√m72.8 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
55 J40.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
24 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

16.6 g/cm³0.6 lb/in³
16.9 g/cm³0.61 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

2,996°C5,425 °F
3,030°C5,486 °F

Liquidus Temperature

2,996°C5,425 °F
3,080°C5,576 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

57.5 W/m·K33.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

202 J/g86.8 BTU/lb
175 J/g75.2 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

300°C572 °F
2,400°C4,352 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 140 J/kg·K0.03 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 6.5 µm/m·K3.6 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -269°C-452 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

12.8 % IACS
4.1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.35×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.31 µΩ·in
4.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m16.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
—

Corrosion Resistance

97 / 100
93 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

22 / 100
18 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
15%

Weldability

72 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

92 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

10 / 100
—

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 55 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

4,200 MJ/kg1,805,677 BTU/lb
4,400 MJ/kg1,891,661 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

260 kg CO₂/kg
265 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

700 L/kg83.9 gal/lb
—

Typical Recycled Content

25%
20%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

15 kN·m/kg
36 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

11.2 MN·m/kg
11.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

78 kJ/m³
552 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

24.7 mm²/s
17.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
19

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePure TaT-222

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPure TaT-222
Default conditionVacuum Annealed—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Pure Ta vs T-222 — frequently asked

Is T-222 stronger than Pure Ta?

Yes. T-222 has a typical yield strength of 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) against 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) for Pure Ta — about 176% more. Tensile strength is 600 MPa (87 ksi) vs 250 MPa (36.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Pure Ta or T-222?

T-222 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while Pure Ta is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, Pure Ta or T-222?

Pure Ta. Its weldability rates very good (72/100) against good (65/100) for T-222.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Pure Ta and T-222 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.