FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal Mo1/Mo2 vs TZM

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal Mo1/Mo2 and TZM are both refractory metal grades. TZM is the stronger of the two: yield strength 760 MPa (110 ksi) against 580 MPa (84.1 ksi) for Mo1/Mo2, about 31% more; tensile strength follows at 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi). In exchange, Mo1/Mo2 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 15% for TZM, and TZM is harder (255 HB vs 225 HB). TZM runs hotter in service (1,300°C vs 1,000°C continuous) and Mo1/Mo2 conducts heat better (138 W/m·K vs 118 W/m·K). On the shop floor, Mo1/Mo2 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than TZM (specialty, $$$$$).

Mo1/Mo2Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

TZMChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Mo1/Mo2 vs TZM: properties

Mo1/Mo2TZM

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

320 GPa46.4 Msi
315 GPa45.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

125 GPa18.1 Msi
122 GPa17.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

262 GPa38 Msi
260 GPa37.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.31
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

700 MPa102 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

580 MPa84.1 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Elongation at Break

18%
15%

Compressive Strength

600 MPa87 ksi
800 MPa116 ksi

Shear Strength

420 MPa60.9 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in
20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

225 HB
255 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

21 HRC
26 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

240 HV
270 HV

Same in both: Reduction in Area 45% · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 8 J5.9 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

2,620°C4,748 °F
2,617°C4,743 °F

Same in both: Density 10.22 g/cm³0.37 lb/in³ · Liquidus Temperature 2,623°C4,753 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

138 W/m·K79.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
118 W/m·K68.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

251 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F
272 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

5 µm/m·K2.8 µin/in·°F
5.3 µm/m·K2.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,000°C1,832 °F
1,300°C2,372 °F

Min Service Temperature

0°C32 °F
20°C68 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

32 % IACS
30 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.13 µΩ·in
5.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.28 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
45 / 100

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.2 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
40%

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Polishability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 20 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb
380 MJ/kg163,371 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

10 kg CO₂/kg
26 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

68 kN·m/kg
88 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

31.3 MN·m/kg
30.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

526 kJ/m³
917 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

53.8 mm²/s
42.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

60
64

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTZMMo1/Mo2

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityMo1/Mo2TZM
Default condition—Stress Relieved
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Mo1/Mo2 vs TZM — frequently asked

Is TZM stronger than Mo1/Mo2?

Yes. TZM has a typical yield strength of 760 MPa (110 ksi) against 580 MPa (84.1 ksi) for Mo1/Mo2 — about 31% more. Tensile strength is 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Mo1/Mo2 or TZM?

Mo1/Mo2 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while TZM is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Mo1/Mo2 or TZM?

TZM, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 40/100 for Mo1/Mo2.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Mo1/Mo2 and TZM side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.