FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal Mo-41Re vs Mo1/Mo2

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal Mo-41Re and Mo1/Mo2 are both refractory metal grades. Mo-41Re is the stronger of the two: yield strength 900 MPa (131 ksi) against 580 MPa (84.1 ksi) for Mo1/Mo2, about 55% more; tensile strength follows at 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi). In exchange, Mo1/Mo2 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 15% for Mo-41Re, and Mo-41Re is harder (33 HRC vs 21 HRC). Mo1/Mo2 is lighter (10.22 g/cm³ vs 13.6 g/cm³ for Mo-41Re) and Mo-41Re is stiffer (360 GPa vs 320 GPa). On the shop floor, Mo1/Mo2 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and Mo-41Re welds better (very good vs poor).

Mo-41ReChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Mo1/Mo2Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Mo-41Re vs Mo1/Mo2: properties

Mo-41ReMo1/Mo2

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

360 GPa52.2 Msi
320 GPa46.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

138 GPa20 Msi
125 GPa18.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

300 GPa43.5 Msi
262 GPa38 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.31

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,100 MPa160 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

900 MPa131 ksi
580 MPa84.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

15%
18%

Reduction in Area

35%
45%

Shear Strength

650 MPa94.3 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

35 MPa·√m31.9 ksi·√in
18 MPa·√m16.4 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell C

33 HRC
21 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

330 HV
240 HV

Compressive Strength

—
600 MPa87 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
8 J5.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

—
225 HB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

13.6 g/cm³0.49 lb/in³
10.22 g/cm³0.37 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

2,500°C4,532 °F
2,620°C4,748 °F

Liquidus Temperature

2,560°C4,640 °F
2,623°C4,753 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F
138 W/m·K79.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

210 J/kg·K0.05 BTU/lb·°F
251 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

5.8 µm/m·K3.2 µin/in·°F
5 µm/m·K2.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

300 J/g129 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,300°C2,372 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Min Service Temperature

-269°C-452 °F
0°C32 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

6.2 % IACS
32 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11 µΩ·in
5.4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.13 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
—

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

22 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

15%
45%

Weldability

70 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

65 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

900 MJ/kg386,931 BTU/lb
150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

60 kg CO₂/kg
10 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

40%
25%

Embodied Water

—
350 L/kg41.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

81 kN·m/kg
68 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
31.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,125 kJ/m³
526 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

15.8 mm²/s
53.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
60

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleMo-41ReMo1/Mo2

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityMo-41ReMo1/Mo2
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Mo-41Re vs Mo1/Mo2 — frequently asked

Is Mo-41Re stronger than Mo1/Mo2?

Yes. Mo-41Re has a typical yield strength of 900 MPa (131 ksi) against 580 MPa (84.1 ksi) for Mo1/Mo2 — about 55% more. Tensile strength is 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Mo-41Re or Mo1/Mo2?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Mo-41Re or Mo1/Mo2?

Mo1/Mo2. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (22/100) for Mo-41Re; for welding the order is Mo-41Re first (very good, 70/100) then Mo1/Mo2 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Mo-41Re and Mo1/Mo2 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.