FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal E110 vs Zr 702

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal E110 and Zr 702 are both refractory metal grades. Zr 702 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) against 255 MPa (37 ksi) for E110, about 14% more; tensile strength follows at 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) vs 390 MPa (56.6 ksi). Zr 702 conducts heat better (22 W/m·K vs 17.5 W/m·K). On the shop floor, Zr 702 welds better (80 vs 70 out of 100).

Zr 702Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

E110 vs Zr 702: properties

E110Zr 702

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

96 GPa13.9 Msi
99 GPa14.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

100 GPa14.5 Msi
92 GPa13.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

390 MPa56.6 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

255 MPa37 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Reduction in Area

55%
45%

Compressive Strength

390 MPa56.6 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Shear Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in
65 MPa·√m59.2 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

45 J33.2 ft·lbf
60 J44.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

155 HB
150 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

84 HRB
85 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

165 HV
160 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 36 GPa5.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.35 · Elongation at Break 30%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

6.55 g/cm³0.24 lb/in³
6.51 g/cm³0.24 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,850°C3,362 °F
1,852°C3,366 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,870°C3,398 °F
1,852°C3,366 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

17.5 W/m·K10.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
22 W/m·K12.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

5.8 µm/m·K3.2 µin/in·°F
5.9 µm/m·K3.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
371°C700 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 285 J/kg·K0.07 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 153 J/g65.8 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.5 % IACS
4.3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.95×10⁻⁷ Ω·m19.5 µΩ·in
4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m15.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.2 V

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
92 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

32 / 100
35 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

22%
30%

Weldability

70 / 100
80 / 100

Castability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 70 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

1,400 MJ/kg601,892 BTU/lb
1,250 MJ/kg537,404 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

90 kg CO₂/kg
85 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 900 L/kg108 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 15%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

60 kN·m/kg
69 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

14.7 MN·m/kg
15.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

339 kJ/m³
425 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

9.4 mm²/s
11.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

12
17

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleZr 702E110

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityE110Zr 702
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

E110 vs Zr 702 — frequently asked

Is Zr 702 stronger than E110?

Yes. Zr 702 has a typical yield strength of 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) against 255 MPa (37 ksi) for E110 — about 14% more. Tensile strength is 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) vs 390 MPa (56.6 ksi).

Which is cheaper, E110 or Zr 702?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, E110 or Zr 702?

Zr 702. Its weldability rates very good (80/100) against very good (70/100) for E110.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in E110 and Zr 702 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.