FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal C-129Y vs Cb-752

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal C-129Y and Cb-752 are both refractory metal grades. C-129Y is the stronger of the two: yield strength 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for Cb-752, about 55% more; tensile strength follows at 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi). In exchange, Cb-752 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 22% for C-129Y, and C-129Y is harder (209 HB vs 170 HB). Cb-752 is lighter (9.03 g/cm³ vs 9.46 g/cm³ for C-129Y) and C-129Y is stiffer (131 GPa vs 110 GPa).

C-129YChoose it when strength drives the design.

Cb-752Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

C-129Y vs Cb-752: properties

C-129YCb-752

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

131 GPa19 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Shear Modulus

48 GPa7 Msi
40 GPa5.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

165 GPa23.9 Msi
170 GPa24.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.36
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

585 MPa84.8 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
25%

Reduction in Area

45%
55%

Compressive Strength

490 MPa71.1 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Shear Strength

360 MPa52.2 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

280 MPa40.6 ksi
220 MPa31.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in
70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

209 HB
170 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

95 HRB
88 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

18 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

220 HV
180 HV

Same in both: Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 40 J29.5 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

9.46 g/cm³0.34 lb/in³
9.03 g/cm³0.33 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

2,450°C4,442 °F
2,470°C4,478 °F

Liquidus Temperature

2,520°C4,568 °F
2,500°C4,532 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

32 W/m·K18.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

7.5 µm/m·K4.2 µin/in·°F
7.1 µm/m·K3.9 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-253°C-423 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 270 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 285 J/g123 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 1,400°C2,552 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.6 % IACS
7.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m18.9 µΩ·in
2.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.45 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
—

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
25%

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
75 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 70 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

620 MJ/kg266,552 BTU/lb
950 MJ/kg408,427 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

42 kg CO₂/kg
62 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

900 L/kg108 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

62 kN·m/kg
50 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.8 MN·m/kg
12.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

879 kJ/m³
437 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

12.5 mm²/s
16.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

19
23

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC-129YCb-752

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC-129YCb-752
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

C-129Y vs Cb-752 — frequently asked

Is C-129Y stronger than Cb-752?

Yes. C-129Y has a typical yield strength of 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for Cb-752 — about 55% more. Tensile strength is 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C-129Y or Cb-752?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C-129Y or Cb-752?

Cb-752, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 25/100 for C-129Y.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C-129Y and Cb-752 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.