FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal C-103 vs Cb-752

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal C-103 and Cb-752 are both refractory metal grades. Cb-752 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for C-103, about 13% more; tensile strength follows at 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) vs 415 MPa (60.2 ksi). Cb-752 is stiffer (110 GPa vs 88 GPa) and Cb-752 conducts electricity better (7.2 % IACS vs 5.1 % IACS). On the shop floor, C-103 welds better (80 vs 70 out of 100), C-103 forms better (excellent vs very good), and Cb-752 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C-103 (specialty, $$$$$).

C-103Choose it when it will be welded.

Cb-752Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

C-103 vs Cb-752: properties

C-103Cb-752

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

88 GPa12.8 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Shear Modulus

33 GPa4.8 Msi
40 GPa5.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

98 GPa14.2 Msi
170 GPa24.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

415 MPa60.2 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Shear Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
220 MPa31.9 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

85 HRB
88 HRB

Compressive Strength

—
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
40 J29.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

—
170 HB

Same in both: Elongation at Break 25% · Reduction in Area 55% · Hardness, Vickers 180 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.85 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
9.03 g/cm³0.33 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

2,350°C4,262 °F
2,470°C4,478 °F

Liquidus Temperature

2,400°C4,352 °F
2,500°C4,532 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
40 W/m·K23.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

272 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F
270 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

7.4 µm/m·K4.1 µin/in·°F
7.1 µm/m·K3.9 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-253°C-423 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 285 J/g123 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 1,400°C2,552 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

5.1 % IACS
7.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m13.4 µΩ·in
2.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.45 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
—

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
75 / 100

Castability

20 / 100
—

Same in both: Machinability 30 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 25% · Brazeability / Solderability 60 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

900 MJ/kg386,931 BTU/lb
950 MJ/kg408,427 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

55 kg CO₂/kg
62 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

47 kN·m/kg
50 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

9.9 MN·m/kg
12.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

430 kJ/m³
437 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

17.4 mm²/s
16.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

27
23

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC-103Cb-752

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC-103Cb-752
Default conditionVacuum Annealed—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

C-103 vs Cb-752 — frequently asked

Is Cb-752 stronger than C-103?

Yes. Cb-752 has a typical yield strength of 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) for C-103 — about 13% more. Tensile strength is 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) vs 415 MPa (60.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C-103 or Cb-752?

Cb-752 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C-103 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, C-103 or Cb-752?

C-103. Its weldability rates very good (80/100) against very good (70/100) for Cb-752.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C-103 and Cb-752 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.