FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal C-129Y vs NbTi

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal C-129Y and NbTi are both refractory metal grades. C-129Y is the stronger of the two: yield strength 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) for NbTi, about 37% more. In exchange, NbTi is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 22% for C-129Y, and C-129Y is harder (209 HB vs 160 HB). NbTi is lighter (6.05 g/cm³ vs 9.46 g/cm³ for C-129Y) and C-129Y is stiffer (131 GPa vs 65 GPa). On the shop floor, C-129Y welds better (very good vs fair).

C-129YChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

NbTiChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

C-129Y vs NbTi: properties

C-129YNbTi

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

131 GPa19 Msi
65 GPa9.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

48 GPa7 Msi
24 GPa3.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

165 GPa23.9 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.36
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

585 MPa84.8 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
25%

Reduction in Area

45%
60%

Compressive Strength

490 MPa71.1 ksi
—

Shear Strength

360 MPa52.2 ksi
—

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

280 MPa40.6 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

209 HB
160 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

95 HRB
88 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

18 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

220 HV
170 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

9.46 g/cm³0.34 lb/in³
6.05 g/cm³0.22 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

2,450°C4,442 °F
1,900°C3,452 °F

Liquidus Temperature

2,520°C4,568 °F
2,020°C3,668 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

32 W/m·K18.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
12 W/m·K6.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

270 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F
350 J/kg·K0.08 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

7.5 µm/m·K4.2 µin/in·°F
8 µm/m·K4.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

285 J/g123 BTU/lb
290 J/g125 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,400°C2,552 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-253°C-423 °F
-271°C-456 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.6 % IACS
2.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m18.9 µΩ·in
6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m23.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.1 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
15%

Weldability

70 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
92 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
40 / 100

Castability

—
25 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

620 MJ/kg266,552 BTU/lb
700 MJ/kg300,946 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

42 kg CO₂/kg
45 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

900 L/kg108 gal/lb
—

Typical Recycled Content

25%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

62 kN·m/kg
102 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

13.8 MN·m/kg
10.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

879 kJ/m³
942 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

12.5 mm²/s
5.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

19
14

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC-129YNbTi

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC-129YNbTi
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

C-129Y vs NbTi — frequently asked

Is C-129Y stronger than NbTi?

Yes. C-129Y has a typical yield strength of 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) against 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) for NbTi — about 37% more. Tensile strength is 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C-129Y or NbTi?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C-129Y or NbTi?

C-129Y, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 25/100 against 20/100 for NbTi; for welding the order is C-129Y first (very good, 70/100) then NbTi (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C-129Y and NbTi side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.