FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal C-103 vs R04261

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal C-103 and R04261 are both refractory metal grades. C-103 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 200 MPa (29 ksi) for R04261, about 38% more; tensile strength follows at 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi). C-103 is harder — 180 HV against 110 HV for R04261 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. R04261 is lighter (8.57 g/cm³ vs 8.85 g/cm³ for C-103) and R04261 is stiffer (103 GPa vs 88 GPa). On the shop floor, R04261 welds better (excellent vs very good) and R04261 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than C-103 (specialty, $$$$$).

C-103Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

R04261Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when it will be welded.

C-103 vs R04261: properties

C-103R04261

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

88 GPa12.8 Msi
103 GPa14.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

33 GPa4.8 Msi
37.5 GPa5.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

98 GPa14.2 Msi
170 GPa24.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

415 MPa60.2 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

275 MPa39.9 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Reduction in Area

55%
60%

Shear Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell B

85 HRB
60 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

180 HV
110 HV

Hardness, Brinell

—
105 HB

Same in both: Elongation at Break 25%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.85 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.57 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

2,350°C4,262 °F
2,410°C4,370 °F

Liquidus Temperature

2,400°C4,352 °F
2,460°C4,460 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
41 W/m·K23.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

272 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F
270 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

7.4 µm/m·K4.1 µin/in·°F
7.1 µm/m·K3.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

285 J/g123 BTU/lb
320 J/g138 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,200°C2,192 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -253°C-423 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

5.1 % IACS
8.6 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m13.4 µΩ·in
2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.87 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
33 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

25%
30%

Weldability

80 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
92 / 100

Castability

20 / 100
—

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 60 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

900 MJ/kg386,931 BTU/lb
1,100 MJ/kg472,915 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

55 kg CO₂/kg
65 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
900 L/kg108 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

47 kN·m/kg
36 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

9.9 MN·m/kg
12 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

430 kJ/m³
194 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

17.4 mm²/s
17.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

27
17

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC-103R04261

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC-103R04261
Default conditionVacuum Annealed—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

C-103 vs R04261 — frequently asked

Is C-103 stronger than R04261?

Yes. C-103 has a typical yield strength of 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 200 MPa (29 ksi) for R04261 — about 38% more. Tensile strength is 415 MPa (60.2 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C-103 or R04261?

R04261 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while C-103 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, C-103 or R04261?

R04261. Its weldability rates excellent (90/100) against very good (80/100) for C-103.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C-103 and R04261 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.