FabDigitFabDigit

TPO Foam vs XPP

Polymer · grade comparison

TPO Foam and XPP are both polymer grades. XPP is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 0.65 MPa (0.0943 ksi) against 0.35 MPa (0.0508 ksi) for TPO Foam, about 86% more. In exchange, TPO Foam is the more ductile: elongation 150% versus 25% for XPP. TPO Foam is lighter (0.05 g/cm³ vs 0.06 g/cm³ for XPP) and XPP is stiffer (0.02 GPa vs 0 GPa).

TPO FoamChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

XPPChoose it when strength drives the design.

TPO Foam vs XPP: properties

TPO FoamXPP

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0 GPa1.45×10⁻⁴ Msi
0.02 GPa0 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.2
0.15

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

0.35 MPa0.05 ksi
0.65 MPa0.09 ksi

Elongation at Break

150%
25%

Compressive Strength

0.04 MPa0.01 ksi
0.3 MPa0.04 ksi

Compressive Modulus

8×10⁻⁴ GPa1.16×10⁻⁴ Msi
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Hardness, Shore A

20 Shore A
—

Tear Strength

2 kN/m8.6 lbf/in
2 kN/m9.1 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

10%
12%

Shear Modulus

—
0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi

Flexural Strength

—
0.55 MPa0.08 ksi

Flexural Modulus

—
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Shear Strength

—
0.3 MPa0.04 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.05 g/cm³0 lb/in³
0.06 g/cm³0 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

145°C293 °F
163°C325 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-50°C-58 °F
-10°C14 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
2%

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.5%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

150 µm/m·K83.3 µin/in·°F
90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

95°C203 °F
100°C212 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

120°C248 °F
130°C266 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F · Limiting Oxygen Index 18%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

1.06
1.1

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹³ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 3×10⁻⁴ · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
92 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

40 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Melt Flow Rate

4 g/10 min
2.5 g/10 min

Mold Temperature (typ.)

150°C302 °F
60°C140 °F

Same in both: Machinability 60 / 100 · Weldability 70 / 100 · Formability (cold) 85 / 100 · Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 190°C374 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
2.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb
60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

8 kN·m/kg
11 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0 MN·m/kg
0.3 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.4 mm²/s
0.3 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityTPO FoamXPP
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

TPO Foam vs XPP — frequently asked

Is XPP stronger than TPO Foam?

Yes. XPP has a typical tensile strength of 0.65 MPa (0.0943 ksi) against 0.35 MPa (0.0508 ksi) for TPO Foam — about 86% more.

Which is cheaper, TPO Foam or XPP?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose TPO Foam over XPP?

Pick TPO Foam when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint. Pick XPP when strength drives the design.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in TPO Foam and XPP side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.