FabDigitFabDigit

IXPE vs XPP

Polymer · grade comparison

IXPE and XPP are both polymer grades. XPP is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 0.65 MPa (0.0943 ksi) against 0.35 MPa (0.0508 ksi) for IXPE, about 86% more. In exchange, IXPE is the more ductile: elongation 150% versus 25% for XPP. IXPE is lighter (0.03 g/cm³ vs 0.06 g/cm³ for XPP) and XPP is stiffer (0.02 GPa vs 0 GPa). On the shop floor, IXPE machines more easily (excellent vs good) and IXPE sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than XPP (premium, $$$).

IXPEChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

XPPChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

IXPE vs XPP: properties

IXPEXPP

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0 GPa3.63×10⁻⁴ Msi
0.02 GPa0 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

0.35 MPa0.05 ksi
0.65 MPa0.09 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

0.2 MPa0.03 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

150%
25%

Compressive Strength

0.04 MPa0.01 ksi
0.3 MPa0.04 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0 GPa3.19×10⁻⁴ Msi
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Flexural Strength

0.22 MPa0.03 ksi
0.55 MPa0.08 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0 GPa2.9×10⁻⁴ Msi
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Shear Strength

0.16 MPa0.02 ksi
0.3 MPa0.04 ksi

Hardness, Shore A

10 Shore A
—

Tear Strength

1 kN/m5.7 lbf/in
2 kN/m9.1 lbf/in

Shear Modulus

—
0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.15 · Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C) 12%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.03 g/cm³0 lb/in³
0.06 g/cm³0 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

110°C230 °F
163°C325 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-110°C-166 °F
-10°C14 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.5%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.5%
2%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

2,000 J/kg·K0.48 BTU/lb·°F
1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

200 µm/m·K111 µin/in·°F
90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

85°C185 °F
100°C212 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

90°C194 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

100°C212 °F
130°C266 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

2×10⁻⁴
3×10⁻⁴

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω
1×10¹³ Ω

Same in both: Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 1.1

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
92 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

85 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

80 / 100
85 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

—
2.5 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

—
190°C374 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
60°C140 °F

Same in both: Weldability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

92 MJ/kg39,553 BTU/lb
85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3 kg CO₂/kg
2.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb
60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.1 MN·m/kg
0.3 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.6 mm²/s
0.3 mm²/s

Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 11 kN·m/kg · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleIXPE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityIXPEXPP
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

IXPE vs XPP — frequently asked

Is XPP stronger than IXPE?

Yes. XPP has a typical tensile strength of 0.65 MPa (0.0943 ksi) against 0.35 MPa (0.0508 ksi) for IXPE — about 86% more.

Which is cheaper, IXPE or XPP?

IXPE is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while XPP is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, IXPE or XPP?

IXPE. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against good (60/100) for XPP.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in IXPE and XPP side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.