FabDigitFabDigit

TPC (COPE/TPEE) vs TPU-Ether

Polymer · grade comparison

TPC (COPE/TPEE) and TPU-Ether are both polymer grades. TPU-Ether is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) against 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) for TPC (COPE/TPEE), about 13% more. TPC (COPE/TPEE) is harder — 55 Shore D against 35 Shore D for TPU-Ether — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. TPU-Ether is lighter (1.12 g/cm³ vs 1.2 g/cm³ for TPC (COPE/TPEE)) and TPC (COPE/TPEE) is stiffer (0.2 GPa vs 0.03 GPa). On the shop floor, TPU-Ether welds better (excellent vs very good).

TPC (COPE/TPEE)Choose it when surface hardness matters, or when the part sees heat.

TPU-EtherChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

TPC (COPE/TPEE) vs TPU-Ether: properties

TPC (COPE/TPEE)TPU-Ether

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.2 GPa0.03 Msi
0.03 GPa0 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.07 GPa0.01 Msi
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.45
0.49

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

40 MPa5.8 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

18 MPa2.6 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

500%
550%

Flexural Modulus

0.21 GPa0.03 Msi
0.03 GPa0 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

900 J/m16.9 ft·lbf/in
—

Hardness, Shore A

96 Shore A
85 Shore A

Hardness, Shore D

55 Shore D
35 Shore D

Tear Strength

145 kN/m828 lbf/in
90 kN/m514 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

42%
35%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.2 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.12 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

208°C406 °F
200°C392 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-50°C-58 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.6%
1%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2.5%
1.8%

Refractive Index

—
1.52

Light Transmission

—
85%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.23 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
1,800 J/kg·K0.43 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

150 µm/m·K83.3 µin/in·°F
170 µm/m·K94.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
80°C176 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-55°C-67 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

105°C221 °F
—

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

50°C122 °F
—

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

180°C356 °F
70°C158 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

21%
22%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

150°C302 °F
120°C248 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in
1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

4
5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.02
0.05

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·cm
1×10¹¹ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω
1×10¹² Ω

Same in both: Dielectric Strength 25 kV/mm635 V/mil · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
—

UV / Weathering Resistance

40 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
35 / 100

Weldability

72 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.2%
0.8%

Melt Flow Rate

8 g/10 min
25 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

230°C446 °F
205°C401 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

40°C104 °F
30°C86 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb
110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.2 kg CO₂/kg
5.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

2%
0%

Same in both: Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

33 kN·m/kg
40 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.2 MN·m/kg
0 MN·m/kg

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

0
2

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTPC (COPE/TPEE)

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityTPC (COPE/TPEE)TPU-Ether
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

TPC (COPE/TPEE) vs TPU-Ether — frequently asked

Is TPU-Ether stronger than TPC (COPE/TPEE)?

Yes. TPU-Ether has a typical tensile strength of 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) against 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) for TPC (COPE/TPEE) — about 13% more.

Which is cheaper, TPC (COPE/TPEE) or TPU-Ether?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, TPC (COPE/TPEE) or TPU-Ether?

TPU-Ether. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (30/100) for TPC (COPE/TPEE); for welding the order is TPU-Ether first (excellent, 90/100) then TPC (COPE/TPEE) (very good, 72/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in TPC (COPE/TPEE) and TPU-Ether side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.