FabDigitFabDigit

TPC (COPE/TPEE) vs TPU-Caprolactone

Polymer · grade comparison

TPC (COPE/TPEE) and TPU-Caprolactone are both polymer grades. TPU-Caprolactone is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) against 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) for TPC (COPE/TPEE), about 13% more. TPC (COPE/TPEE) is harder — 55 Shore D against 35 Shore D for TPU-Caprolactone — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. TPC (COPE/TPEE) is stiffer (0.2 GPa vs 0.03 GPa) and TPC (COPE/TPEE) runs hotter in service (120°C vs 85°C continuous). On the shop floor, TPU-Caprolactone welds better (excellent vs very good).

TPC (COPE/TPEE)Choose it when surface hardness matters, or when the part sees heat.

TPU-CaprolactoneChoose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

TPC (COPE/TPEE) vs TPU-Caprolactone: properties

TPC (COPE/TPEE)TPU-Caprolactone

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.2 GPa0.03 Msi
0.03 GPa0 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.07 GPa0.01 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.45
0.48

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

40 MPa5.8 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

18 MPa2.6 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

500%
550%

Flexural Modulus

0.21 GPa0.03 Msi
—

Izod Impact, Notched

900 J/m16.9 ft·lbf/in
—

Hardness, Shore A

96 Shore A
86 Shore A

Hardness, Shore D

55 Shore D
35 Shore D

Tear Strength

145 kN/m828 lbf/in
85 kN/m485 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

42%
30%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Temperature (Tm)

208°C406 °F
195°C383 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2.5%
1.5%

Same in both: Density 1.2 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³ · Glass Transition (Tg) -50°C-58 °F · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.6%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.23 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

150 µm/m·K83.3 µin/in·°F
175 µm/m·K97.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
85°C185 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

105°C221 °F
—

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

50°C122 °F
—

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

180°C356 °F
68°C154 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

150°C302 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Limiting Oxygen Index 21%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in
1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

4
5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.02
0.05

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·cm
1×10¹² Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω
1×10¹² Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Same in both: Dielectric Strength 25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
78 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

72 / 100
85 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
90 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.2%
0.9%

Melt Flow Rate

8 g/10 min
25 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

230°C446 °F
210°C410 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

40°C104 °F
30°C86 °F

Same in both: Machinability 30 / 100 · Polishability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb
125 MJ/kg53,740 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.2 kg CO₂/kg
6 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

2%
0%

Same in both: Embodied Water 250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

33 kN·m/kg
38 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.2 MN·m/kg
0 MN·m/kg

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

0
2

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTPC (COPE/TPEE)

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityTPC (COPE/TPEE)TPU-Caprolactone
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

TPC (COPE/TPEE) vs TPU-Caprolactone — frequently asked

Is TPU-Caprolactone stronger than TPC (COPE/TPEE)?

Yes. TPU-Caprolactone has a typical tensile strength of 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) against 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) for TPC (COPE/TPEE) — about 13% more.

Which is cheaper, TPC (COPE/TPEE) or TPU-Caprolactone?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, TPC (COPE/TPEE) or TPU-Caprolactone?

TPU-Caprolactone. Its weldability rates excellent (85/100) against very good (72/100) for TPC (COPE/TPEE).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in TPC (COPE/TPEE) and TPU-Caprolactone side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.