FabDigitFabDigit

ABS vs TPC (COPE/TPEE)

Polymer · grade comparison

ABS and TPC (COPE/TPEE) are both polymer grades. ABS is the stronger of the two: yield strength 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 18 MPa (2.61 ksi) for TPC (COPE/TPEE), about 133% more; tensile strength follows at 43 MPa (6.24 ksi) vs 40 MPa (5.8 ksi). In exchange, TPC (COPE/TPEE) is the more ductile: elongation 500% versus 25% for ABS, and ABS is harder (78 Shore D vs 55 Shore D). ABS is lighter (1.04 g/cm³ vs 1.2 g/cm³ for TPC (COPE/TPEE)) and ABS is stiffer (2.3 GPa vs 0.2 GPa). On the shop floor, ABS machines more easily (very good vs poor) and ABS sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than TPC (COPE/TPEE) (premium, $$$).

ABSChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

TPC (COPE/TPEE)Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

ABS vs TPC (COPE/TPEE): properties

ABSTPC (COPE/TPEE)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
0.2 GPa0.03 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
0.07 GPa0.01 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.45

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

43 MPa6.2 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
18 MPa2.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
500%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
—

Compressive Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
0.21 GPa0.03 Msi

Shear Strength

34 MPa4.9 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in
900 J/m16.9 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
55 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
—

Hardness, Shore A

—
96 Shore A

Tear Strength

—
145 kN/m828 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

—
42%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.04 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.2 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.6%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1%
2.5%

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
208°C406 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.23 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,450 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F
150 µm/m·K83.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
120°C248 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

95°C203 °F
105°C221 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

85°C185 °F
50°C122 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
180°C356 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
21%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
150°C302 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
4

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.009
0.02

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹³ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
80 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

22 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
72 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
40 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.55%
1.2%

Melt Flow Rate

20 g/10 min
8 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
230°C446 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
40°C104 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.8 kg CO₂/kg
5.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
2%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
33 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.2 MN·m/kg
0.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

383 kJ/m³
810 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleABSTPC (COPE/TPEE)

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityABSTPC (COPE/TPEE)
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
UV CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

ABS vs TPC (COPE/TPEE) — frequently asked

Is ABS stronger than TPC (COPE/TPEE)?

Yes. ABS has a typical yield strength of 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) against 18 MPa (2.61 ksi) for TPC (COPE/TPEE) — about 133% more. Tensile strength is 43 MPa (6.24 ksi) vs 40 MPa (5.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, ABS or TPC (COPE/TPEE)?

ABS is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while TPC (COPE/TPEE) is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, ABS or TPC (COPE/TPEE)?

ABS. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against poor (30/100) for TPC (COPE/TPEE); for welding the order is ABS first (very good, 78/100) then TPC (COPE/TPEE) (very good, 72/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ABS and TPC (COPE/TPEE) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.