FabDigitFabDigit

MPR vs TPC (COPE/TPEE)

Polymer · grade comparison

MPR and TPC (COPE/TPEE) are both polymer grades. TPC (COPE/TPEE) is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) against 9 MPa (1.23 ksi) for MPR, about 4.7 times as much. TPC (COPE/TPEE) is the more ductile: elongation 500% versus 300% for MPR, and TPC (COPE/TPEE) is harder (55 Shore D vs 24 Shore D). TPC (COPE/TPEE) is stiffer (0.2 GPa vs 0.01 GPa).

TPC (COPE/TPEE)Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

MPR vs TPC (COPE/TPEE): properties

MPRTPC (COPE/TPEE)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.01 GPa0 Msi
0.2 GPa0.03 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.48
0.45

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

9 MPa1.2 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

300%
500%

Flexural Modulus

0.02 GPa0 Msi
0.21 GPa0.03 Msi

Hardness, Shore A

70 Shore A
96 Shore A

Hardness, Shore D

24 Shore D
55 Shore D

Tear Strength

30 kN/m171 lbf/in
145 kN/m828 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

30%
42%

Shear Modulus

—
0.07 GPa0.01 Msi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
18 MPa2.6 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

—
900 J/m16.9 ft·lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Glass Transition (Tg)

-25°C-13 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
208°C406 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
2.5%

Same in both: Density 1.2 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³ · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.6%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.21 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.23 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F
1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

190 µm/m·K106 µin/in·°F
150 µm/m·K83.3 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

30%
21%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

145°C293 °F
150°C302 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

—
105°C221 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
50°C122 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
180°C356 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 120°C248 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in
1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

18 kV/mm457 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

6.5
4

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·cm
1×10¹³ Ω·cm

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.02

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
80 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

80 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

75 / 100
72 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.8%
1.2%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

170°C338 °F
230°C446 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

30°C86 °F
40°C104 °F

Polishability

—
40 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

—
8 g/10 min

Same in both: Machinability 30 / 100 · Formability (cold) 85 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.2 kg CO₂/kg
5.2 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

10%
2%

Embodied Water

—
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

7 kN·m/kg
33 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0 MN·m/kg
0.2 MN·m/kg

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

1
0

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTPC (COPE/TPEE)

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityMPRTPC (COPE/TPEE)
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

MPR vs TPC (COPE/TPEE) — frequently asked

Is TPC (COPE/TPEE) stronger than MPR?

Yes. TPC (COPE/TPEE) has a typical tensile strength of 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) against 9 MPa (1.23 ksi) for MPR — about 4.7 times as much.

Which is cheaper, MPR or TPC (COPE/TPEE)?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose MPR over TPC (COPE/TPEE)?

Pick TPC (COPE/TPEE) when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in MPR and TPC (COPE/TPEE) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.