FabDigitFabDigit

SMC vs Vinyl Ester

Polymer · grade comparison

SMC and Vinyl Ester are both polymer grades. Vinyl Ester is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 84 MPa (12.2 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for SMC, about 12% more. Vinyl Ester is the more ductile: elongation 5.5% versus 1.5% for SMC. Vinyl Ester is lighter (1.13 g/cm³ vs 1.85 g/cm³ for SMC) and SMC is stiffer (11 GPa vs 3.3 GPa). On the shop floor, Vinyl Ester machines more easily (good vs poor).

SMCChoose it when the part sees heat.

Vinyl EsterChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

SMC vs Vinyl Ester: properties

SMCVinyl Ester

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

11 GPa1.6 Msi
3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Shear Modulus

4.2 GPa0.61 Msi
1.2 GPa0.17 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.36

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
84 MPa12.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

1.5%
5.5%

Compressive Strength

180 MPa26.1 ksi
115 MPa16.7 ksi

Compressive Modulus

11 GPa1.6 Msi
3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Flexural Strength

180 MPa26.1 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Flexural Modulus

11 GPa1.6 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Shear Strength

50 MPa7.3 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

550 J/m10.3 ft·lbf/in
30 J/m0.56 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

100 HRM
105 HRM

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.58 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
0.85 MPa·√m0.77 ksi·√in

Hardness, Shore D

—
88 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.85 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³
1.13 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

115°C239 °F
120°C248 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.2%
0.15%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.7%
0.8%

Refractive Index

—
1.55

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F
60 µm/m·K33.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

130°C266 °F
95°C203 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

240°C464 °F
120°C248 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

215°C419 °F
105°C221 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

25%
21%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

180°C356 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

15 kV/mm381 V/mil
17 kV/mm432 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

4.8
3.3

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
550 V

Same in both: Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.02

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
85 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

55 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.1%
2%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

150°C302 °F
40°C104 °F

Same in both: Weldability 5 / 100 · Formability (cold) 5 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb
80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
74 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

5.9 MN·m/kg
2.9 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilitySMCVinyl Ester
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

SMC vs Vinyl Ester — frequently asked

Is Vinyl Ester stronger than SMC?

Yes. Vinyl Ester has a typical tensile strength of 84 MPa (12.2 ksi) against 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) for SMC — about 12% more.

Which is cheaper, SMC or Vinyl Ester?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, SMC or Vinyl Ester?

Vinyl Ester. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against poor (30/100) for SMC.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in SMC and Vinyl Ester side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.