FabDigitFabDigit

SMC vs UP

Polymer · grade comparison

SMC and UP are both polymer grades. SMC is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) against 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) for UP, about 36% more. In exchange, UP is the more ductile: elongation 2% versus 1.5% for SMC. UP is lighter (1.2 g/cm³ vs 1.85 g/cm³ for SMC) and SMC is stiffer (11 GPa vs 3.4 GPa). On the shop floor, UP machines more easily (good vs poor) and UP sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than SMC (standard, $$).

SMCChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

UPChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

SMC vs UP: properties

SMCUP

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

11 GPa1.6 Msi
3.4 GPa0.49 Msi

Shear Modulus

4.2 GPa0.61 Msi
1.3 GPa0.19 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.35

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

75 MPa10.9 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Elongation at Break

1.5%
2%

Compressive Strength

180 MPa26.1 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

11 GPa1.6 Msi
3.4 GPa0.49 Msi

Flexural Strength

180 MPa26.1 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Flexural Modulus

11 GPa1.6 Msi
3.6 GPa0.52 Msi

Shear Strength

50 MPa7.3 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

550 J/m10.3 ft·lbf/in
16 J/m0.3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

100 HRM
98 HRM

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.57 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
0.5 MPa·√m0.46 ksi·√in

Hardness, Shore D

—
85 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.85 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³
1.2 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

115°C239 °F
90°C194 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.2%
0.25%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.7%
1.2%

Refractive Index

—
1.55

Light Transmission

—
85%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F
100 µm/m·K55.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

130°C266 °F
85°C185 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

240°C464 °F
90°C194 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

215°C419 °F
72°C162 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

25%
19%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

180°C356 °F
130°C266 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

15 kV/mm381 V/mil
17 kV/mm432 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

4.8
3.2

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.02 · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
50 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

55 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
65 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.1%
2%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

150°C302 °F
25°C77 °F

Same in both: Weldability 5 / 100 · Formability (cold) 5 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb
70 MJ/kg30,095 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.4 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

41 kN·m/kg
46 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

5.9 MN·m/kg
2.8 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilitySMCUP
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

SMC vs UP — frequently asked

Is SMC stronger than UP?

Yes. SMC has a typical tensile strength of 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) against 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) for UP — about 36% more.

Which is cheaper, SMC or UP?

UP is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while SMC is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, SMC or UP?

UP. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against poor (30/100) for SMC.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in SMC and UP side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.