FabDigitFabDigit

UP vs Vinyl Ester

Polymer · grade comparison

UP and Vinyl Ester are both polymer grades. Vinyl Ester is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 84 MPa (12.2 ksi) against 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) for UP, about 53% more. Vinyl Ester is the more ductile: elongation 5.5% versus 2% for UP. Vinyl Ester is lighter (1.13 g/cm³ vs 1.2 g/cm³ for UP) and Vinyl Ester runs hotter in service (95°C vs 85°C continuous). On the shop floor, UP sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than Vinyl Ester (standard, $$).

UPChoose it when cost is the deciding factor.

Vinyl EsterChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

UP vs Vinyl Ester: properties

UPVinyl Ester

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.4 GPa0.49 Msi
3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.3 GPa0.19 Msi
1.2 GPa0.17 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.57 Msi
4 GPa0.58 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.36

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
84 MPa12.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
5.5%

Compressive Strength

130 MPa18.9 ksi
115 MPa16.7 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3.4 GPa0.49 Msi
3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Flexural Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.6 GPa0.52 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Shear Strength

48 MPa7 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

0.5 MPa·√m0.46 ksi·√in
0.85 MPa·√m0.77 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

16 J/m0.3 ft·lbf/in
30 J/m0.56 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

85 Shore D
88 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

98 HRM
105 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.2 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.13 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

90°C194 °F
120°C248 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.25%
0.15%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.2%
0.8%

Light Transmission

85%
—

Same in both: Refractive Index 1.55

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

100 µm/m·K55.6 µin/in·°F
60 µm/m·K33.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

85°C185 °F
95°C203 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

90°C194 °F
120°C248 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

72°C162 °F
105°C221 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
21%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

130°C266 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.2
3.3

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
550 V

Same in both: Dielectric Strength 17 kV/mm432 V/mil · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.02 · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

50 / 100
85 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

40 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Polishability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Temperature (typ.)

25°C77 °F
40°C104 °F

Same in both: Machinability 55 / 100 · Weldability 5 / 100 · Formability (cold) 5 / 100 · Mold Shrinkage 2%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

70 MJ/kg30,095 BTU/lb
80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.4 kg CO₂/kg
5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

46 kN·m/kg
74 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.8 MN·m/kg
2.9 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityUPVinyl Ester
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

UP vs Vinyl Ester — frequently asked

Is Vinyl Ester stronger than UP?

Yes. Vinyl Ester has a typical tensile strength of 84 MPa (12.2 ksi) against 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) for UP — about 53% more.

Which is cheaper, UP or Vinyl Ester?

UP is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while Vinyl Ester is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose UP over Vinyl Ester?

Pick UP when cost is the deciding factor. Pick Vinyl Ester when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in UP and Vinyl Ester side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.