FabDigitFabDigit

BMC vs Vinyl Ester

Polymer · grade comparison

BMC and Vinyl Ester are both polymer grades. Vinyl Ester is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 84 MPa (12.2 ksi) against 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) for BMC, about 100% more. Vinyl Ester is the more ductile: elongation 5.5% versus 0.5% for BMC. Vinyl Ester is lighter (1.13 g/cm³ vs 1.85 g/cm³ for BMC) and BMC is stiffer (11 GPa vs 3.3 GPa). On the shop floor, Vinyl Ester machines more easily (good vs fair).

BMCChoose it when the part sees heat.

Vinyl EsterChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

BMC vs Vinyl Ester: properties

BMCVinyl Ester

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

11 GPa1.6 Msi
3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Shear Modulus

4.2 GPa0.61 Msi
1.2 GPa0.17 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.36

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

42 MPa6.1 ksi
84 MPa12.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

0.5%
5.5%

Compressive Strength

160 MPa23.2 ksi
115 MPa16.7 ksi

Compressive Modulus

10 GPa1.5 Msi
3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Flexural Strength

85 MPa12.3 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Flexural Modulus

10.5 GPa1.5 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Shear Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

75 J/m1.4 ft·lbf/in
30 J/m0.56 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

100 HRM
105 HRM

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.58 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
0.85 MPa·√m0.77 ksi·√in

Hardness, Shore D

—
88 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.85 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³
1.13 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.6%
0.8%

Refractive Index

—
1.55

Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) 120°C248 °F · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.15%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.6 W/m·K0.35 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,100 J/kg·K0.26 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F
60 µm/m·K33.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
95°C203 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

250°C482 °F
120°C248 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

220°C428 °F
105°C221 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

24%
21%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

200°C392 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

14 kV/mm356 V/mil
17 kV/mm432 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

4.6
3.3

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
550 V

Same in both: Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.02

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
85 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

60 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

3 / 100
5 / 100

Formability (cold)

3 / 100
5 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.15%
2%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

35°C95 °F
—

Mold Temperature (typ.)

160°C320 °F
40°C104 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3 kg CO₂/kg
5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

23 kN·m/kg
74 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

5.9 MN·m/kg
2.9 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.3 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityBMCVinyl Ester
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

BMC vs Vinyl Ester — frequently asked

Is Vinyl Ester stronger than BMC?

Yes. Vinyl Ester has a typical tensile strength of 84 MPa (12.2 ksi) against 42 MPa (6.09 ksi) for BMC — about 100% more.

Which is cheaper, BMC or Vinyl Ester?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, BMC or Vinyl Ester?

Vinyl Ester. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (35/100) for BMC.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in BMC and Vinyl Ester side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.