FabDigitFabDigit

DAP vs SMC

Polymer · grade comparison

DAP and SMC are both polymer grades. SMC is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) against 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) for DAP, about 36% more. SMC is the more ductile: elongation 1.5% versus 0.6% for DAP. DAP runs hotter in service (180°C vs 130°C continuous) and DAP conducts heat better (0.5 W/m·K vs 0.25 W/m·K). On the shop floor, DAP machines more easily (fair vs poor) and SMC sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than DAP (high, $$$$).

DAPChoose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

SMCChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

DAP vs SMC: properties

DAPSMC

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

10.5 GPa1.5 Msi
11 GPa1.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

0.6%
1.5%

Compressive Strength

200 MPa29 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Flexural Strength

105 MPa15.2 ksi
180 MPa26.1 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

40 J/m0.75 ft·lbf/in
550 J/m10.3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

110 HRM
100 HRM

Shear Modulus

—
4.2 GPa0.61 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
11 GPa1.6 Msi

Shear Strength

—
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Same in both: Flexural Modulus 11 GPa1.6 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.8 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³
1.85 g/cm³0.07 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

160°C320 °F
115°C239 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.6%
0.7%

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.2%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.5 W/m·K0.29 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,050 J/kg·K0.25 BTU/lb·°F
1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

180°C356 °F
130°C266 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

285°C545 °F
240°C464 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

265°C509 °F
215°C419 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

32%
25%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

230°C446 °F
180°C356 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
15 kV/mm381 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

4.3
4.8

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.011
0.02

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹³ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω
1×10¹³ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

200 V
600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

0 / 100
5 / 100

Formability (cold)

0 / 100
5 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.4%
0.1%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

160°C320 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

31 kN·m/kg
41 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

5.8 MN·m/kg
5.9 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.3 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityDAPSMC
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

DAP vs SMC — frequently asked

Is SMC stronger than DAP?

Yes. SMC has a typical tensile strength of 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) against 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) for DAP — about 36% more.

Which is cheaper, DAP or SMC?

SMC is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while DAP is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, DAP or SMC?

DAP. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (30/100) for SMC; for welding the order is SMC first (not recommended, 5/100) then DAP (not recommended, 0/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in DAP and SMC side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.