FabDigitFabDigit

PU Foam vs TPU

Polymer · grade comparison

PU Foam and TPU are both polymer grades. TPU is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) against 0.13 MPa (0.0189 ksi) for PU Foam, about 308 times as much. TPU is the more ductile: elongation 550% versus 150% for PU Foam. PU Foam is lighter (0.03 g/cm³ vs 1.18 g/cm³ for TPU) and TPU is stiffer (0.03 GPa vs 2×10⁻⁴ GPa). On the shop floor, PU Foam machines more easily (excellent vs poor), TPU welds better (excellent vs poor), and PU Foam sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than TPU (standard, $$).

PU FoamChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

TPUChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PU Foam vs TPU: properties

PU FoamTPU

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2×10⁻⁴ GPa2.9×10⁻⁵ Msi
0.03 GPa0 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.48

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

0.13 MPa0.02 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

150%
550%

Compressive Strength

0.01 MPa7.25×10⁻⁴ ksi
—

Tear Strength

0.3 kN/m1.7 lbf/in
70 kN/m400 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

5%
35%

Hardness, Shore A

—
85 Shore A

Hardness, Shore D

—
33 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.03 g/cm³0 lb/in³
1.18 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

-50°C-58 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

800%
1.8%

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
185°C365 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

—
0.8%

Refractive Index

—
1.51

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F
1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F
170 µm/m·K94.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

90°C194 °F
80°C176 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
22%

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
72°C162 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 120°C248 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in
1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

1.1
5

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·cm
1×10¹¹ Ω·cm

Dielectric Strength

—
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.05

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹² Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
40 / 100

Corrosion Resistance

—
78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
25 / 100

Weldability

30 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

5 / 100
40 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.5%
1.2%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

50°C122 °F
30°C86 °F

Melt Flow Rate

—
25 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

—
210°C410 °F

Same in both: Formability (cold) 90 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

102 MJ/kg43,852 BTU/lb
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.6 kg CO₂/kg
5.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
2%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

4 kN·m/kg
34 kN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.8 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

0
2

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 0 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTPUPU Foam

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPU FoamTPU
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
3D printing—Yes
Default conditionOpen CellShore A 85
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Conductive Coating—Yes
Dyeing (Nylon)—Yes
Painting—Yes
Primer Coating—Yes
Tinted Coating—Yes
Vacuum Metallization—Yes
Waterproof Coating—Yes

Both are offered for Injection molding. They share 5 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

PU Foam vs TPU — frequently asked

Is TPU stronger than PU Foam?

Yes. TPU has a typical tensile strength of 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) against 0.13 MPa (0.0189 ksi) for PU Foam — about 308 times as much.

Which is cheaper, PU Foam or TPU?

PU Foam is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while TPU is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PU Foam or TPU?

PU Foam. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against poor (25/100) for TPU; for welding the order is TPU first (excellent, 85/100) then PU Foam (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PU Foam and TPU side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.