FabDigitFabDigit

EPP Foam vs PU Foam

Polymer · grade comparison

EPP Foam and PU Foam are both polymer grades. EPP Foam is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 0.5 MPa (0.0725 ksi) against 0.13 MPa (0.0189 ksi) for PU Foam, about 3.8 times as much. In exchange, PU Foam is the more ductile: elongation 150% versus 15% for EPP Foam. PU Foam is lighter (0.03 g/cm³ vs 0.05 g/cm³ for EPP Foam) and EPP Foam is stiffer (0.01 GPa vs 2×10⁻⁴ GPa). On the shop floor, PU Foam machines more easily (excellent vs good), EPP Foam welds better (fair vs poor), and PU Foam sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than EPP Foam (standard, $$).

EPP FoamChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PU FoamChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

EPP Foam vs PU Foam: properties

EPP FoamPU Foam

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.01 GPa0 Msi
2×10⁻⁴ GPa2.9×10⁻⁵ Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.1
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

0.5 MPa0.07 ksi
0.13 MPa0.02 ksi

Elongation at Break

15%
150%

Compressive Strength

0.3 MPa0.04 ksi
0.01 MPa7.25×10⁻⁴ ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi
—

Flexural Strength

0.6 MPa0.09 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

0.01 GPa0 Msi
—

Shear Strength

0.25 MPa0.04 ksi
—

Tear Strength

0.9 kN/m5.1 lbf/in
0.3 kN/m1.7 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

8%
5%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.05 g/cm³0 lb/in³
0.03 g/cm³0 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

162°C324 °F
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

-10°C14 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.6%
—

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2.5%
800%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

100°C212 °F
90°C194 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
19%

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 120°C248 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

1.06
1.1

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹² Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
—

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
90 / 100

Weldability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
90 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
1.5%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

145°C293 °F
50°C122 °F

Same in both: Polishability 5 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
102 MJ/kg43,852 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.6 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb
220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

11 kN·m/kg
4 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.2 MN·m/kg
0 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.5 mm²/s
0.8 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePU FoamEPP Foam

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityEPP FoamPU Foam
Default conditionClosed CellOpen Cell
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both are offered for Injection molding. Both take the same 5 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

EPP Foam vs PU Foam — frequently asked

Is EPP Foam stronger than PU Foam?

Yes. EPP Foam has a typical tensile strength of 0.5 MPa (0.0725 ksi) against 0.13 MPa (0.0189 ksi) for PU Foam — about 3.8 times as much.

Which is cheaper, EPP Foam or PU Foam?

PU Foam is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while EPP Foam is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, EPP Foam or PU Foam?

PU Foam. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against good (60/100) for EPP Foam; for welding the order is EPP Foam first (fair, 45/100) then PU Foam (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in EPP Foam and PU Foam side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.