FabDigitFabDigit

Poron vs TPU

Polymer · grade comparison

Poron and TPU are both polymer grades. TPU is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) against 1 MPa (0.145 ksi) for Poron, about 40 times as much. TPU is the more ductile: elongation 550% versus 150% for Poron. Poron is lighter (0.32 g/cm³ vs 1.18 g/cm³ for TPU) and TPU is stiffer (0.03 GPa vs 0 GPa). On the shop floor, Poron machines more easily (very good vs poor).

PoronChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

TPUChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Poron vs TPU: properties

PoronTPU

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0 GPa2.18×10⁻⁴ Msi
0.03 GPa0 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.48

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1 MPa0.15 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

150%
550%

Compressive Strength

0.07 MPa0.01 ksi
—

Compressive Modulus

8×10⁻⁴ GPa1.16×10⁻⁴ Msi
—

Hardness, Shore A

20 Shore A
85 Shore A

Tear Strength

2 kN/m8.6 lbf/in
70 kN/m400 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

5%
35%

Hardness, Shore D

—
33 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.32 g/cm³0.01 lb/in³
1.18 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

-35°C-31 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

3%
0.8%

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
185°C365 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
1.8%

Refractive Index

—
1.51

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.06 W/m·K0.03 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

90°C194 °F
80°C176 °F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

—
170 µm/m·K94.4 µin/in·°F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

—
72°C162 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

—
22%

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,700 J/kg·K0.41 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 120°C248 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

1.7
5

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·cm
1×10¹¹ Ω·cm

Electrical Resistivity

—
1×10⁹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁶ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

—
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.05

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹² Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
78 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
25 / 100

Weldability

—
85 / 100

Polishability

—
40 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

—
1.2%

Melt Flow Rate

—
25 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

—
210°C410 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
30°C86 °F

Same in both: Formability (cold) 90 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5 kg CO₂/kg
5.2 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

0%
2%

Embodied Water

—
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

3 kN·m/kg
34 kN·m/kg

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 0 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTPUPoron

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPoronTPU
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
3D printing—Yes
Default conditionStandardShore A 85
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Conductive Coating—Yes
Dyeing (Nylon)—Yes
Painting—Yes
Primer Coating—Yes
Tinted Coating—Yes
Vacuum Metallization—Yes
Waterproof Coating—Yes

Both are offered for Injection molding. They share 5 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

Poron vs TPU — frequently asked

Is TPU stronger than Poron?

Yes. TPU has a typical tensile strength of 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) against 1 MPa (0.145 ksi) for Poron — about 40 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Poron or TPU?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Poron or TPU?

Poron. Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against poor (25/100) for TPU.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Poron and TPU side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.