FabDigitFabDigit

PETG vs PU Foam

Polymer · grade comparison

PETG and PU Foam are both polymer grades, both multipurpose plastic. PETG is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 0.13 MPa (0.0189 ksi) for PU Foam, about 385 times as much. In exchange, PU Foam is the more ductile: elongation 150% versus 120% for PETG. PU Foam is lighter (0.03 g/cm³ vs 1.27 g/cm³ for PETG) and PETG is stiffer (2.1 GPa vs 2×10⁻⁴ GPa). On the shop floor, PU Foam machines more easily (excellent vs good) and PETG welds better (very good vs poor).

PETGChoose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

PU FoamChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PETG vs PU Foam: properties

PETGPU Foam

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.1 GPa0.3 Msi
2×10⁻⁴ GPa2.9×10⁻⁵ Msi

Shear Modulus

0.77 GPa0.11 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

50 MPa7.3 ksi
0.13 MPa0.02 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

50 MPa7.3 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

120%
150%

Compressive Strength

60 MPa8.7 ksi
0.01 MPa7.25×10⁻⁴ ksi

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

2.1 GPa0.3 Msi
—

Izod Impact, Notched

95 J/m1.8 ft·lbf/in
—

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
—

Hardness, Rockwell R

115 HRR
—

Tear Strength

—
0.3 kN/m1.7 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

—
5%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.27 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
0.03 g/cm³0 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

80°C176 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.13%
—

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.5%
800%

Refractive Index

1.57
—

Light Transmission

89%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

68 µm/m·K37.8 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

63°C145 °F
90°C194 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

70°C158 °F
—

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

64°C147 °F
—

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

82°C180 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

23%
19%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

75°C167 °F
120°C248 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
—

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.8
1.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.02
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹² Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
—

UV / Weathering Resistance

45 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
90 / 100

Weldability

80 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

88 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

72 / 100
5 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.35%
1.5%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

245°C473 °F
—

Mold Temperature (typ.)

25°C77 °F
50°C122 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

84 MJ/kg36,114 BTU/lb
102 MJ/kg43,852 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

210 L/kg25.2 gal/lb
220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

39 kN·m/kg
4 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.7 MN·m/kg
0 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.8 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePETGPU Foam

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPETGPU Foam
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionUnfilledOpen Cell
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

Both are offered for Injection molding. They share 5 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

PETG vs PU Foam — frequently asked

Is PETG stronger than PU Foam?

Yes. PETG has a typical tensile strength of 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 0.13 MPa (0.0189 ksi) for PU Foam — about 385 times as much.

Which is cheaper, PETG or PU Foam?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PETG or PU Foam?

PU Foam. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against good (65/100) for PETG; for welding the order is PETG first (very good, 80/100) then PU Foam (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PETG and PU Foam side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.