FabDigitFabDigit

PMMA-HI vs PMMA-UV

Polymer · grade comparison

PMMA-HI and PMMA-UV are both polymer grades. PMMA-UV is the stronger of the two: yield strength 72 MPa (10.4 ksi) against 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) for PMMA-HI, about 50% more; tensile strength follows at 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi). In exchange, PMMA-HI is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 4.5% for PMMA-UV. PMMA-UV is stiffer (3.3 GPa vs 2.2 GPa) and PMMA-UV runs hotter in service (80°C vs 72°C continuous).

PMMA-HIChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PMMA-UVChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PMMA-HI vs PMMA-UV: properties

PMMA-HIPMMA-UV

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
1.2 GPa0.17 Msi

Bulk Modulus

5 GPa0.65 Msi
5 GPa0.73 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

50 MPa7.3 ksi
75 MPa10.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

48 MPa7 ksi
72 MPa10.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

30%
4.5%

Compressive Strength

88 MPa12.8 ksi
115 MPa16.7 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Flexural Strength

78 MPa11.3 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Shear Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.2 MPa·√m2 ksi·√in
1.2 MPa·√m1.1 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

70 J/m1.3 ft·lbf/in
18 J/m0.34 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

86 Shore D
89 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

60 HRM
95 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

112 HRR
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.38

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.16 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.19 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

102°C216 °F
110°C230 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.25%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.9%
2%

Refractive Index

1.49
1.491

Light Transmission

89%
92%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

72°C162 °F
80°C176 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

88°C190 °F
112°C234 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

80°C176 °F
100°C212 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
113°C235 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
95°C203 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 1,470 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 18%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.8
2.75

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.022
0.02

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 25 kV/mm635 V/mil · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

75 / 100
78 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

82 / 100
96 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

78 / 100
80 / 100

Weldability

62 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
65 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
96 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.55%
0.5%

Melt Flow Rate

4 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
240°C464 °F

Same in both: Mold Temperature (typ.) 70°C158 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.6 kg CO₂/kg
5.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 103 MJ/kg44,282 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 2%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

43 kN·m/kg
63 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.9 MN·m/kg
2.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

524 kJ/m³
785 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePMMA-HIPMMA-UV

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPMMA-HIPMMA-UV
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PMMA-HI vs PMMA-UV — frequently asked

Is PMMA-UV stronger than PMMA-HI?

Yes. PMMA-UV has a typical yield strength of 72 MPa (10.4 ksi) against 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) for PMMA-HI — about 50% more. Tensile strength is 75 MPa (10.9 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PMMA-HI or PMMA-UV?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose PMMA-HI over PMMA-UV?

Pick PMMA-HI when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded. Pick PMMA-UV when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PMMA-HI and PMMA-UV side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.