FabDigitFabDigit

PMMA-HI vs PMMA-Optical

Polymer · grade comparison

PMMA-HI and PMMA-Optical are both polymer grades. PMMA-Optical is the stronger of the two: yield strength 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) against 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) for PMMA-HI, about 46% more; tensile strength follows at 72 MPa (10.4 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi). In exchange, PMMA-HI is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 4.5% for PMMA-Optical. PMMA-Optical is stiffer (3.2 GPa vs 2.2 GPa).

PMMA-HIChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PMMA-OpticalChoose it when strength drives the design.

PMMA-HI vs PMMA-Optical: properties

PMMA-HIPMMA-Optical

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
1.2 GPa0.17 Msi

Bulk Modulus

5 GPa0.65 Msi
5 GPa0.73 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.37

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

50 MPa7.3 ksi
72 MPa10.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

48 MPa7 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

30%
4.5%

Compressive Strength

88 MPa12.8 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Flexural Strength

78 MPa11.3 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Shear Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.2 MPa·√m2 ksi·√in
1.1 MPa·√m1 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

70 J/m1.3 ft·lbf/in
18 J/m0.34 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

86 Shore D
90 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

60 HRM
95 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

112 HRR
—

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.16 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.19 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

102°C216 °F
105°C221 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.25%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.9%
2%

Refractive Index

1.49
1.492

Light Transmission

89%
93%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

72°C162 °F
75°C167 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

88°C190 °F
98°C208 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

80°C176 °F
92°C198 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

100°C212 °F
108°C226 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
95°C203 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 1,470 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.022
0.02

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 25 kV/mm635 V/mil · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 2.8 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

75 / 100
72 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

82 / 100
88 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

78 / 100
72 / 100

Weldability

62 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
96 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.55%
0.5%

Melt Flow Rate

4 g/10 min
8 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
245°C473 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

70°C158 °F
75°C167 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

103 MJ/kg44,282 BTU/lb
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.6 kg CO₂/kg
6.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
280 L/kg33.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

2%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

43 kN·m/kg
61 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.9 MN·m/kg
2.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

524 kJ/m³
766 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePMMA-HIPMMA-Optical

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPMMA-HIPMMA-Optical
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PMMA-HI vs PMMA-Optical — frequently asked

Is PMMA-Optical stronger than PMMA-HI?

Yes. PMMA-Optical has a typical yield strength of 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) against 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) for PMMA-HI — about 46% more. Tensile strength is 72 MPa (10.4 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PMMA-HI or PMMA-Optical?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PMMA-HI or PMMA-Optical?

PMMA-HI, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 78/100 against 72/100 for PMMA-Optical.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PMMA-HI and PMMA-Optical side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.