FabDigitFabDigit

PMMA-FR vs PMMA-HI

Polymer · grade comparison

PMMA-FR and PMMA-HI are both polymer grades. PMMA-FR is the stronger of the two: yield strength 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) against 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) for PMMA-HI, about 29% more; tensile strength follows at 68 MPa (9.86 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi). In exchange, PMMA-HI is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 4.5% for PMMA-FR. PMMA-HI is lighter (1.16 g/cm³ vs 1.21 g/cm³ for PMMA-FR) and PMMA-FR is stiffer (3.1 GPa vs 2.2 GPa). On the shop floor, PMMA-HI sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than PMMA-FR (premium, $$$).

PMMA-FRChoose it when strength drives the design.

PMMA-HIChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PMMA-FR vs PMMA-HI: properties

PMMA-FRPMMA-HI

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.1 GPa0.45 Msi
2.2 GPa0.32 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.2 GPa0.17 Msi
0.85 GPa0.12 Msi

Bulk Modulus

5 GPa0.73 Msi
5 GPa0.65 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.37
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

68 MPa9.9 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

62 MPa9 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Elongation at Break

4.5%
30%

Compressive Strength

110 MPa16 ksi
88 MPa12.8 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Flexural Strength

105 MPa15.2 ksi
78 MPa11.3 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.1 GPa0.45 Msi
2.3 GPa0.33 Msi

Shear Strength

55 MPa8 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

1.1 MPa·√m1 ksi·√in
2.2 MPa·√m2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

16 J/m0.3 ft·lbf/in
70 J/m1.3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

88 Shore D
86 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

88 HRM
60 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
112 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.21 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.16 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

103°C217 °F
102°C216 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2%
1.9%

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.3% · Refractive Index 1.49 · Light Transmission 89%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

72 µm/m·K40 µin/in·°F
75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
72°C162 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

92°C198 °F
88°C190 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

88°C190 °F
80°C176 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

105°C221 °F
100°C212 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

28%
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
90°C194 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 1,470 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.02
0.022

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 25 kV/mm635 V/mil · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 2.8 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

82 / 100
75 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

80 / 100
82 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

60 / 100
62 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
82 / 100

Polishability

95 / 100
85 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.5%
0.55%

Same in both: Machinability 78 / 100 · Melt Flow Rate 4 g/10 min · Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 235°C455 °F · Mold Temperature (typ.) 70°C158 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
103 MJ/kg44,282 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.6 kg CO₂/kg
5.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

280 L/kg33.6 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
2%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

56 kN·m/kg
43 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.6 MN·m/kg
1.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

620 kJ/m³
524 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePMMA-HIPMMA-FR

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPMMA-FRPMMA-HI
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PMMA-FR vs PMMA-HI — frequently asked

Is PMMA-FR stronger than PMMA-HI?

Yes. PMMA-FR has a typical yield strength of 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) against 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) for PMMA-HI — about 29% more. Tensile strength is 68 MPa (9.86 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PMMA-FR or PMMA-HI?

PMMA-HI is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while PMMA-FR is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose PMMA-FR over PMMA-HI?

Pick PMMA-FR when strength drives the design. Pick PMMA-HI when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PMMA-FR and PMMA-HI side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.