FabDigitFabDigit

PFA vs TFM-PTFE

Polymer · grade comparison

PFA and TFM-PTFE are both polymer grades. TFM-PTFE is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 33 MPa (4.79 ksi) against 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) for PFA, about 10% more. TFM-PTFE is the more ductile: elongation 480% versus 330% for PFA, and PFA is harder (60 Shore D vs 57 Shore D). PFA is stiffer (0.6 GPa vs 0.55 GPa) and TFM-PTFE conducts heat better (0.25 W/m·K vs 0.22 W/m·K). On the shop floor, TFM-PTFE machines more easily (68 vs 55 out of 100), PFA welds better (very good vs good), and TFM-PTFE sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than PFA (specialty, $$$$$).

PFAChoose it when it will be welded.

TFM-PTFEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PFA vs TFM-PTFE: properties

PFATFM-PTFE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.6 GPa0.09 Msi
0.55 GPa0.08 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.45
0.46

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

30 MPa4.4 ksi
33 MPa4.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

14 MPa2 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

330%
480%

Flexural Strength

17 MPa2.5 ksi
—

Shear Strength

17 MPa2.5 ksi
16 MPa2.3 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

1,300 J/m24.3 ft·lbf/in
170 J/m3.2 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore A

97 Shore A
—

Hardness, Shore D

60 Shore D
57 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

50 HRR
58 HRR

Compressive Modulus

—
0.7 GPa0.1 Msi

Same in both: Compressive Strength 12 MPa1.7 ksi · Flexural Modulus 0.62 GPa0.09 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.15 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³
2.16 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

305°C581 °F
327°C621 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

90°C194 °F
126°C259 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.02%
0.01%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.03%
0.01%

Light Transmission

92%
—

Same in both: Refractive Index 1.35

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,100 J/kg·K0.26 BTU/lb·°F
1,000 J/kg·K0.24 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

130 µm/m·K72.2 µin/in·°F
125 µm/m·K69.4 µin/in·°F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

74°C165 °F
120°C248 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

48°C118 °F
55°C131 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

95°C203 °F
—

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

285°C545 °F
300°C572 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 260°C500 °F · Min Service Temperature -200°C-328 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 95%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

25 kV/mm635 V/mil
45 kV/mm1,143 V/mil

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·m3.94×10²³ µΩ·in · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 2.1 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 2×10⁻⁴ · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁸ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁷ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

100 / 100
99 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

99 / 100
96 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
68 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

4.2%
4%

Melt Flow Rate

5 g/10 min
—

Mold Temperature (typ.)

180°C356 °F
—

Same in both: Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 370°C698 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

250 MJ/kg107,481 BTU/lb
220 MJ/kg94,583 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
11 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

14 kN·m/kg
15 kN·m/kg

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 0.3 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePFA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPFATFM-PTFE
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionHigh Purity (Semiconductor)—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

PFA vs TFM-PTFE — frequently asked

Is TFM-PTFE stronger than PFA?

Yes. TFM-PTFE has a typical tensile strength of 33 MPa (4.79 ksi) against 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) for PFA — about 10% more.

Which is cheaper, PFA or TFM-PTFE?

TFM-PTFE is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while PFA is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PFA or TFM-PTFE?

TFM-PTFE, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 68/100 against 55/100 for PFA; for welding the order is PFA first (very good, 78/100) then TFM-PTFE (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PFA and TFM-PTFE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.