FabDigitFabDigit

PFA vs PVF

Polymer · grade comparison

PFA and PVF are both polymer grades. PVF is the stronger of the two: yield strength 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) against 14 MPa (2.03 ksi) for PFA, about 3.2 times as much; tensile strength follows at 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi). In exchange, PFA is the more ductile: elongation 330% versus 150% for PVF. PVF is lighter (1.45 g/cm³ vs 2.15 g/cm³ for PFA) and PVF is stiffer (2.2 GPa vs 0.6 GPa). On the shop floor, PFA machines more easily (good vs poor), PFA welds better (very good vs poor), and PVF sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than PFA (specialty, $$$$$).

PFAChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PVFChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

PFA vs PVF: properties

PFAPVF

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.6 GPa0.09 Msi
2.2 GPa0.32 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.45
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

30 MPa4.4 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

14 MPa2 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

330%
150%

Compressive Strength

12 MPa1.7 ksi
—

Flexural Strength

17 MPa2.5 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

0.62 GPa0.09 Msi
—

Shear Strength

17 MPa2.5 ksi
—

Izod Impact, Notched

1,300 J/m24.3 ft·lbf/in
—

Hardness, Shore A

97 Shore A
—

Hardness, Shore D

60 Shore D
—

Hardness, Rockwell R

50 HRR
—

Tear Strength

—
8 kN/m45.7 lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.15 g/cm³0.08 lb/in³
1.45 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

305°C581 °F
200°C392 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

90°C194 °F
40°C104 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.02%
0.5%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.03%
1.5%

Refractive Index

1.35
1.46

Same in both: Light Transmission 92%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.15 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,100 J/kg·K0.26 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

130 µm/m·K72.2 µin/in·°F
50 µm/m·K27.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

260°C500 °F
107°C225 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-70°C-94 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

74°C165 °F
—

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

48°C118 °F
—

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

95°C203 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

95%
23%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

285°C545 °F
175°C347 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·m3.94×10²³ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

25 kV/mm635 V/mil
140 kV/mm3,556 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.1
6.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

2×10⁻⁴
0.06

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁸ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁷ Ω
—

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

100 / 100
88 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

99 / 100
98 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
30 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
65 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
20 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

4.2%
—

Melt Flow Rate

5 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

370°C698 °F
—

Mold Temperature (typ.)

180°C356 °F
—

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

250 MJ/kg107,481 BTU/lb
170 MJ/kg73,087 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12 kg CO₂/kg
9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

14 kN·m/kg
62 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.3 MN·m/kg
1.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

163 kJ/m³
460 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePFAPVF

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPFAPVF
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionHigh Purity (Semiconductor)—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

PFA vs PVF — frequently asked

Is PVF stronger than PFA?

Yes. PVF has a typical yield strength of 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) against 14 MPa (2.03 ksi) for PFA — about 3.2 times as much. Tensile strength is 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PFA or PVF?

PVF is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while PFA is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PFA or PVF?

PFA. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against poor (30/100) for PVF; for welding the order is PFA first (very good, 78/100) then PVF (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PFA and PVF side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.