FabDigitFabDigit

PEX vs UHMW-PE

Polymer · grade comparison

PEX and UHMW-PE are both polymer grades. UHMW-PE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 21 MPa (3.05 ksi) against 17 MPa (2.47 ksi) for PEX, about 24% more; tensile strength follows at 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) vs 22 MPa (3.19 ksi). In exchange, PEX is the more ductile: elongation 500% versus 350% for UHMW-PE, and UHMW-PE is harder (64 Shore D vs 60 Shore D). UHMW-PE is stiffer (0.72 GPa vs 0.68 GPa) and PEX runs hotter in service (95°C vs 80°C continuous). On the shop floor, UHMW-PE machines more easily (very good vs fair).

PEXChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

UHMW-PEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

PEX vs UHMW-PE: properties

PEXUHMW-PE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.68 GPa0.1 Msi
0.72 GPa0.1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.45
0.46

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

22 MPa3.2 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

17 MPa2.5 ksi
21 MPa3 ksi

Elongation at Break

500%
350%

Compressive Strength

18 MPa2.6 ksi
20 MPa2.9 ksi

Flexural Strength

17 MPa2.5 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.63 GPa0.09 Msi
0.75 GPa0.11 Msi

Shear Strength

14 MPa2 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

300 J/m5.6 ft·lbf/in
1,300 J/m24.3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore A

95 Shore A
—

Hardness, Shore D

60 Shore D
64 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

42 HRR
50 HRR

Tear Strength

95 kN/m542 lbf/in
—

Shear Modulus

—
0.25 GPa0.04 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
0.6 GPa0.09 Msi

Same in both: Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.94 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.94 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

132°C270 °F
135°C275 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.03%
0.01%

Refractive Index

—
1.51

Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) -120°C-184 °F · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.01%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.38 W/m·K0.22 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.41 W/m·K0.24 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

2,300 J/kg·K0.55 BTU/lb·°F
1,840 J/kg·K0.44 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

170 µm/m·K94.4 µin/in·°F
200 µm/m·K111 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

95°C203 °F
80°C176 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

70°C158 °F
80°C176 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

42°C108 °F
44°C111 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

98°C208 °F
80°C176 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
17%

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (short-term) 110°C230 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

25 kV/mm635 V/mil
30 kV/mm762 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

4×10⁻⁴
3×10⁻⁴

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 2.3 · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

42 / 100
75 / 100

Weldability

10 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2.5%
3%

Melt Flow Rate

1 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

215°C419 °F
200°C392 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
—

Same in both: Polishability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

82 MJ/kg35,254 BTU/lb
85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.3 kg CO₂/kg
3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb
100 L/kg12 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

23 kN·m/kg
43 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.7 MN·m/kg
0.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

213 kJ/m³
306 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleUHMW-PEPEX

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPEXUHMW-PE
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—FDA
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

PEX vs UHMW-PE — frequently asked

Is UHMW-PE stronger than PEX?

Yes. UHMW-PE has a typical yield strength of 21 MPa (3.05 ksi) against 17 MPa (2.47 ksi) for PEX — about 24% more. Tensile strength is 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) vs 22 MPa (3.19 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PEX or UHMW-PE?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PEX or UHMW-PE?

UHMW-PE. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against fair (42/100) for PEX; for welding the order is UHMW-PE first (poor, 15/100) then PEX (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PEX and UHMW-PE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.