FabDigitFabDigit

PEEK-Bearing-Grade vs PEK

Polymer · grade comparison

PEEK-Bearing-Grade and PEK are both polymer grades. PEEK-Bearing-Grade is the stronger of the two: yield strength 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) for PEK, about 10% more; tensile strength follows at 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) vs 110 MPa (16 ksi). In exchange, PEK is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 2.5% for PEEK-Bearing-Grade. PEK is lighter (1.3 g/cm³ vs 1.44 g/cm³ for PEEK-Bearing-Grade) and PEEK-Bearing-Grade is stiffer (7.7 GPa vs 4 GPa). On the shop floor, PEK machines more easily (65 vs 55 out of 100) and PEK welds better (good vs poor).

PEEK-Bearing-GradeChoose it when strength drives the design.

PEKChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PEEK-Bearing-Grade vs PEK: properties

PEEK-Bearing-GradePEK

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

7.7 GPa1.1 Msi
4 GPa0.58 Msi

Shear Modulus

2.8 GPa0.41 Msi
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

130 MPa18.9 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

115 MPa16.7 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

2.5%
25%

Compressive Strength

140 MPa20.3 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

6 GPa0.87 Msi
3.8 GPa0.55 Msi

Flexural Strength

180 MPa26.1 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

7.2 GPa1 Msi
4.2 GPa0.61 Msi

Shear Strength

68 MPa9.9 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

45 J/m0.84 ft·lbf/in
55 J/m1 ft·lbf/in

Same in both: Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in · Hardness, Shore D 87 Shore D · Hardness, Rockwell M 100 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.44 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.3 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

343°C649 °F
373°C703 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

150°C302 °F
157°C315 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.12%
0.1%

Same in both: Water Absorption (Saturation) 0.4%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.9 W/m·K0.52 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,250 J/kg·K0.3 BTU/lb·°F
1,340 J/kg·K0.32 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F
45 µm/m·K25 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
260°C500 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-70°C-94 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

325°C617 °F
320°C608 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

300°C572 °F
165°C329 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

320°C608 °F
180°C356 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

35%
40%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

310°C590 °F
320°C608 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1,000 Ω·m3.94×10¹⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

100,000 Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

100,000 Ω
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Dielectric Strength

—
20 kV/mm508 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

—
3.3

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.003

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
150 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

95 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

70 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

20 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
25 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.3%
1.3%

Melt Flow Rate

6 g/10 min
4 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

380°C716 °F
400°C752 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

190°C374 °F
200°C392 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

300 MJ/kg128,977 BTU/lb
320 MJ/kg137,575 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

13 kg CO₂/kg
22 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

450 L/kg53.9 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

90 kN·m/kg
85 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

5.3 MN·m/kg
3.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

859 kJ/m³
1,378 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.5 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

1
0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePEKPEEK-Bearing-Grade

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPEEK-Bearing-GradePEK
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PEEK-Bearing-Grade vs PEK — frequently asked

Is PEEK-Bearing-Grade stronger than PEK?

Yes. PEEK-Bearing-Grade has a typical yield strength of 115 MPa (16.7 ksi) against 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) for PEK — about 10% more. Tensile strength is 130 MPa (18.9 ksi) vs 110 MPa (16 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PEEK-Bearing-Grade or PEK?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PEEK-Bearing-Grade or PEK?

PEK, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 55/100 for PEEK-Bearing-Grade; for welding the order is PEK first (good, 55/100) then PEEK-Bearing-Grade (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PEEK-Bearing-Grade and PEK side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.