FabDigitFabDigit

PE80 vs UHMW-PE

Polymer · grade comparison

PE80 and UHMW-PE are both polymer grades. UHMW-PE is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) against 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) for PE80, about 33% more. In exchange, PE80 is the more ductile: elongation 700% versus 350% for UHMW-PE, and UHMW-PE is harder (64 Shore D vs 60 Shore D). PE80 is stiffer (0.9 GPa vs 0.72 GPa) and UHMW-PE runs hotter in service (80°C vs 60°C continuous). On the shop floor, UHMW-PE machines more easily (very good vs good), PE80 welds better (excellent vs poor), and PE80 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than UHMW-PE (standard, $$).

PE80Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

UHMW-PEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PE80 vs UHMW-PE: properties

PE80UHMW-PE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.9 GPa0.13 Msi
0.72 GPa0.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.32 GPa0.05 Msi
0.25 GPa0.04 Msi

Bulk Modulus

2 GPa0.32 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.44
0.46

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

30 MPa4.4 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

700%
350%

Flexural Modulus

0.85 GPa0.12 Msi
0.75 GPa0.11 Msi

Shear Strength

16 MPa2.3 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

220 J/m4.1 ft·lbf/in
1,300 J/m24.3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

60 Shore D
64 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

48 HRR
50 HRR

Compressive Modulus

—
0.6 GPa0.09 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Same in both: Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 21 MPa3 ksi · Compressive Strength 20 MPa2.9 ksi · Flexural Strength 25 MPa3.6 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.95 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.94 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

129°C264 °F
135°C275 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-110°C-166 °F
-120°C-184 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.03%
0.01%

Refractive Index

—
1.51

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.01%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.42 W/m·K0.24 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.41 W/m·K0.24 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
1,840 J/kg·K0.44 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

180 µm/m·K100 µin/in·°F
200 µm/m·K111 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

60°C140 °F
80°C176 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

72°C162 °F
80°C176 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

45°C113 °F
44°C111 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

76°C169 °F
80°C176 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
17%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

80°C176 °F
110°C230 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
30 kV/mm762 V/mil

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 2.3 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 3×10⁻⁴ · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

85 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

58 / 100
75 / 100

Weldability

95 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

80 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2.2%
3%

Melt Flow Rate

0.8 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

205°C401 °F
200°C392 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

30°C86 °F
—

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb
85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

80 L/kg9.6 gal/lb
100 L/kg12 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

32 kN·m/kg
43 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.9 MN·m/kg
0.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

245 kJ/m³
306 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleUHMW-PEPE80

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPE80UHMW-PE
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—FDA
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

PE80 vs UHMW-PE — frequently asked

Is UHMW-PE stronger than PE80?

Yes. UHMW-PE has a typical tensile strength of 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) against 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) for PE80 — about 33% more.

Which is cheaper, PE80 or UHMW-PE?

PE80 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while UHMW-PE is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PE80 or UHMW-PE?

UHMW-PE. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against good (58/100) for PE80; for welding the order is PE80 first (excellent, 95/100) then UHMW-PE (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PE80 and UHMW-PE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.