FabDigitFabDigit

PA11 vs PA6T

Polymer · grade comparison

PA11 and PA6T are both polymer grades. PA6T is the stronger of the two: yield strength 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) for PA11, about 138% more; tensile strength follows at 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi). In exchange, PA11 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 20% for PA6T, and PA6T is harder (86 Shore D vs 75 Shore D). PA11 is lighter (1.03 g/cm³ vs 1.19 g/cm³ for PA6T) and PA6T is stiffer (3.2 GPa vs 1.6 GPa). On the shop floor, PA11 welds better (very good vs good).

PA11Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PA6TChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PA11 vs PA6T: properties

PA11PA6T

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.6 GPa0.23 Msi
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.55 GPa0.08 Msi
1.2 GPa0.17 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

48 MPa7 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

40 MPa5.8 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
20%

Compressive Strength

50 MPa7.3 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Flexural Strength

47 MPa6.8 ksi
135 MPa19.6 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
3.1 GPa0.45 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

55 J/m1 ft·lbf/in
50 J/m0.94 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

75 Shore D
86 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

105 HRR
122 HRR

Bulk Modulus

—
5 GPa0.77 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Shear Strength

—
62 MPa9 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
95 HRM

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.4

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.03 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.19 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

188°C370 °F
315°C599 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

46°C115 °F
125°C257 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

1.9%
4%

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.3%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

1,800 J/kg·K0.43 BTU/lb·°F
1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

120 µm/m·K66.7 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

85°C185 °F
140°C284 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

180°C356 °F
250°C482 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

50°C122 °F
115°C239 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

160°C320 °F
265°C509 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

25%
26%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

130°C266 °F
210°C410 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

23 kV/mm584 V/mil
28 kV/mm711 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.2
3.6

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.04
0.018

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
76 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

55 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.2%
1.4%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

235°C455 °F
330°C626 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

60°C140 °F
140°C284 °F

Formability (cold)

—
25 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5 kg CO₂/kg
8.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

40%
0%

Embodied Water

—
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

47 kN·m/kg
84 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.6 MN·m/kg
2.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

500 kJ/m³
1,410 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePA11PA6T

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPA11PA6T
3D printingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
UV CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

PA11 vs PA6T — frequently asked

Is PA6T stronger than PA11?

Yes. PA6T has a typical yield strength of 95 MPa (13.8 ksi) against 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) for PA11 — about 138% more. Tensile strength is 100 MPa (14.5 ksi) vs 48 MPa (6.96 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PA11 or PA6T?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PA11 or PA6T?

PA11, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 60/100 for PA6T; for welding the order is PA11 first (very good, 70/100) then PA6T (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PA11 and PA6T side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.