FabDigitFabDigit

mLLDPE vs UHMW-PE

Polymer · grade comparison

mLLDPE and UHMW-PE are both polymer grades. UHMW-PE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 21 MPa (3.05 ksi) against 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) for mLLDPE, about 110% more; tensile strength follows at 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi). In exchange, mLLDPE is the more ductile: elongation 750% versus 350% for UHMW-PE, and UHMW-PE is harder (64 Shore D vs 48 Shore D). UHMW-PE is stiffer (0.72 GPa vs 0.25 GPa) and UHMW-PE conducts heat better (0.41 W/m·K vs 0.33 W/m·K). On the shop floor, UHMW-PE machines more easily (very good vs fair) and mLLDPE welds better (excellent vs poor).

mLLDPEChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

UHMW-PEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

mLLDPE vs UHMW-PE: properties

mLLDPEUHMW-PE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.25 GPa0.04 Msi
0.72 GPa0.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.09 GPa0.01 Msi
0.25 GPa0.04 Msi

Bulk Modulus

2 GPa0.26 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.45
0.46

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

30 MPa4.4 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

10 MPa1.5 ksi
21 MPa3 ksi

Elongation at Break

750%
350%

Flexural Modulus

0.28 GPa0.04 Msi
0.75 GPa0.11 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

850 J/m15.9 ft·lbf/in
1,300 J/m24.3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore A

92 Shore A
—

Hardness, Shore D

48 Shore D
64 Shore D

Compressive Strength

—
20 MPa2.9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

—
0.6 GPa0.09 Msi

Flexural Strength

—
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Shear Strength

—
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
50 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.92 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.94 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

120°C248 °F
135°C275 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.02%
0.01%

Light Transmission

90%
—

Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) -120°C-184 °F · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.01% · Refractive Index 1.51

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.33 W/m·K0.19 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.41 W/m·K0.24 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

2,100 J/kg·K0.5 BTU/lb·°F
1,840 J/kg·K0.44 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

180 µm/m·K100 µin/in·°F
200 µm/m·K111 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

75°C167 °F
80°C176 °F

Min Service Temperature

-70°C-94 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

55°C131 °F
80°C176 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

35°C95 °F
44°C111 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

98°C208 °F
80°C176 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
17%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
110°C230 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

28 kV/mm711 V/mil
30 kV/mm762 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

2×10⁻⁴
3×10⁻⁴

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 2.3 · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
75 / 100

Weldability

90 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

92 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
3%

Melt Flow Rate

1 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

205°C401 °F
200°C392 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

25°C77 °F
—

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb
85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 100 L/kg12 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

33 kN·m/kg
43 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.3 MN·m/kg
0.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

200 kJ/m³
306 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleUHMW-PEmLLDPE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilitymLLDPEUHMW-PE
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—FDA
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

mLLDPE vs UHMW-PE — frequently asked

Is UHMW-PE stronger than mLLDPE?

Yes. UHMW-PE has a typical yield strength of 21 MPa (3.05 ksi) against 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) for mLLDPE — about 110% more. Tensile strength is 40 MPa (5.8 ksi) vs 30 MPa (4.35 ksi).

Which is cheaper, mLLDPE or UHMW-PE?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, mLLDPE or UHMW-PE?

UHMW-PE. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against fair (50/100) for mLLDPE; for welding the order is mLLDPE first (excellent, 90/100) then UHMW-PE (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in mLLDPE and UHMW-PE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.