FabDigitFabDigit

MDPE vs PEX

Polymer · grade comparison

MDPE and PEX are both polymer grades. MDPE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 19 MPa (2.76 ksi) against 17 MPa (2.47 ksi) for PEX, about 12% more; tensile strength follows at 24 MPa (3.48 ksi) vs 22 MPa (3.19 ksi). MDPE is the more ductile: elongation 700% versus 500% for PEX. MDPE is stiffer (0.75 GPa vs 0.68 GPa) and PEX runs hotter in service (95°C vs 65°C continuous). On the shop floor, MDPE machines more easily (good vs fair), MDPE welds better (excellent vs not recommended), and MDPE sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PEX (standard, $$).

MDPEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PEXChoose it when the part sees heat.

MDPE vs PEX: properties

MDPEPEX

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.75 GPa0.11 Msi
0.68 GPa0.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.26 GPa0.04 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

2 GPa0.29 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.44
0.45

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

24 MPa3.5 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

19 MPa2.8 ksi
17 MPa2.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

700%
500%

Compressive Strength

19 MPa2.8 ksi
18 MPa2.6 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.7 GPa0.1 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

22 MPa3.2 ksi
17 MPa2.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.72 GPa0.1 Msi
0.63 GPa0.09 Msi

Shear Strength

18 MPa2.6 ksi
14 MPa2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

130 J/m2.4 ft·lbf/in
300 J/m5.6 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

58 Shore D
60 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

45 HRR
42 HRR

Hardness, Shore A

—
95 Shore A

Tear Strength

—
95 kN/m542 lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.93 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.94 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

127°C261 °F
132°C270 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-110°C-166 °F
-120°C-184 °F

Refractive Index

1.52
—

Light Transmission

45%
—

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.01% · Water Absorption (Saturation) 0.03%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.4 W/m·K0.23 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.38 W/m·K0.22 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
2,300 J/kg·K0.55 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

65°C149 °F
95°C203 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

74°C165 °F
70°C158 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

45°C113 °F
42°C108 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

115°C239 °F
98°C208 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
110°C230 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 170 µm/m·K94.4 µin/in·°F · Limiting Oxygen Index 18%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

3×10⁻⁴
4×10⁻⁴

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 2.3 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
92 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
42 / 100

Weldability

95 / 100
10 / 100

Formability (cold)

80 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
2.5%

Melt Flow Rate

0.9 g/10 min
1 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

210°C410 °F
215°C419 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

40°C104 °F
60°C140 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb
82 MJ/kg35,254 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
2.3 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb
120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

26 kN·m/kg
23 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.8 MN·m/kg
0.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

241 kJ/m³
213 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleMDPEPEX

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityMDPEPEX
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

MDPE vs PEX — frequently asked

Is MDPE stronger than PEX?

Yes. MDPE has a typical yield strength of 19 MPa (2.76 ksi) against 17 MPa (2.47 ksi) for PEX — about 12% more. Tensile strength is 24 MPa (3.48 ksi) vs 22 MPa (3.19 ksi).

Which is cheaper, MDPE or PEX?

MDPE is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PEX is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, MDPE or PEX?

MDPE. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (42/100) for PEX; for welding the order is MDPE first (excellent, 95/100) then PEX (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in MDPE and PEX side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.