FabDigitFabDigit

LLDPE vs MDPE

Polymer · grade comparison

LLDPE and MDPE are both polymer grades. MDPE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 19 MPa (2.76 ksi) against 11 MPa (1.6 ksi) for LLDPE, about 73% more. MDPE is harder — 58 Shore D against 50 Shore D for LLDPE — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. MDPE is stiffer (0.75 GPa vs 0.25 GPa) and LLDPE runs hotter in service (80°C vs 65°C continuous). On the shop floor, LLDPE forms better (excellent vs very good).

LLDPEChoose it when the part sees heat.

MDPEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

LLDPE vs MDPE: properties

LLDPEMDPE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.25 GPa0.04 Msi
0.75 GPa0.11 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.09 GPa0.01 Msi
0.26 GPa0.04 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.45
0.44

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

25 MPa3.6 ksi
24 MPa3.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

11 MPa1.6 ksi
19 MPa2.8 ksi

Compressive Strength

11 MPa1.6 ksi
19 MPa2.8 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.25 GPa0.04 Msi
0.7 GPa0.1 Msi

Flexural Strength

12 MPa1.7 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.28 GPa0.04 Msi
0.72 GPa0.1 Msi

Shear Strength

15 MPa2.2 ksi
18 MPa2.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.5 MPa·√m2.3 ksi·√in
3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

800 J/m15 ft·lbf/in
130 J/m2.4 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore A

93 Shore A
—

Hardness, Shore D

50 Shore D
58 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

40 HRR
45 HRR

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 2 GPa0.29 Msi · Elongation at Break 700%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.92 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.93 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

123°C253 °F
127°C261 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.02%
0.03%

Refractive Index

1.51
1.52

Light Transmission

—
45%

Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) -110°C-166 °F · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.01%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.33 W/m·K0.19 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.4 W/m·K0.23 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

2,300 J/kg·K0.55 BTU/lb·°F
1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

180 µm/m·K100 µin/in·°F
170 µm/m·K94.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

80°C176 °F
65°C149 °F

Min Service Temperature

-70°C-94 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

60°C140 °F
74°C165 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

37°C99 °F
45°C113 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

95°C203 °F
115°C239 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

17%
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
90°C194 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·m3.94×10²² µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

25 kV/mm635 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁷ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Same in both: Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 2.3 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 3×10⁻⁴ · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 90 / 100 · UV / Weathering Resistance 25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

90 / 100
95 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
80 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

2 g/10 min
0.9 g/10 min

Same in both: Machinability 55 / 100 · Polishability 30 / 100 · Mold Shrinkage 2% · Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 210°C410 °F · Mold Temperature (typ.) 40°C104 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

85 L/kg10.2 gal/lb
90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
5%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
26 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.3 MN·m/kg
0.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

242 kJ/m³
241 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleLLDPEMDPE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityLLDPEMDPE
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

LLDPE vs MDPE — frequently asked

Is MDPE stronger than LLDPE?

Yes. MDPE has a typical yield strength of 19 MPa (2.76 ksi) against 11 MPa (1.6 ksi) for LLDPE — about 73% more. Tensile strength is 24 MPa (3.48 ksi) vs 25 MPa (3.63 ksi).

Which is cheaper, LLDPE or MDPE?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, LLDPE or MDPE?

MDPE. Its weldability rates excellent (95/100) against excellent (90/100) for LLDPE.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in LLDPE and MDPE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.