FabDigitFabDigit

LLDPE vs PEX

Polymer · grade comparison

LLDPE and PEX are both polymer grades. PEX is the stronger of the two: yield strength 17 MPa (2.47 ksi) against 11 MPa (1.6 ksi) for LLDPE, about 55% more. In exchange, LLDPE is the more ductile: elongation 700% versus 500% for PEX, and PEX is harder (60 Shore D vs 50 Shore D). PEX is stiffer (0.68 GPa vs 0.25 GPa) and PEX runs hotter in service (95°C vs 80°C continuous). On the shop floor, LLDPE machines more easily (good vs fair), LLDPE welds better (excellent vs not recommended), and LLDPE sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PEX (standard, $$).

LLDPEChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

PEXChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

LLDPE vs PEX: properties

LLDPEPEX

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.25 GPa0.04 Msi
0.68 GPa0.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.09 GPa0.01 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

2 GPa0.29 Msi
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

25 MPa3.6 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

11 MPa1.6 ksi
17 MPa2.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

700%
500%

Compressive Strength

11 MPa1.6 ksi
18 MPa2.6 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.25 GPa0.04 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

12 MPa1.7 ksi
17 MPa2.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.28 GPa0.04 Msi
0.63 GPa0.09 Msi

Shear Strength

15 MPa2.2 ksi
14 MPa2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.5 MPa·√m2.3 ksi·√in
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

800 J/m15 ft·lbf/in
300 J/m5.6 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore A

93 Shore A
95 Shore A

Hardness, Shore D

50 Shore D
60 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

40 HRR
42 HRR

Tear Strength

—
95 kN/m542 lbf/in

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.45

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.92 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.94 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

123°C253 °F
132°C270 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-110°C-166 °F
-120°C-184 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.02%
0.03%

Refractive Index

1.51
—

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.01%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.33 W/m·K0.19 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.38 W/m·K0.22 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

180 µm/m·K100 µin/in·°F
170 µm/m·K94.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

80°C176 °F
95°C203 °F

Min Service Temperature

-70°C-94 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

60°C140 °F
70°C158 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

37°C99 °F
42°C108 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

95°C203 °F
98°C208 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

17%
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
110°C230 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 2,300 J/kg·K0.55 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·m3.94×10²² µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

3×10⁻⁴
4×10⁻⁴

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁷ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Same in both: Dielectric Strength 25 kV/mm635 V/mil · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 2.3 · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
92 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
42 / 100

Weldability

90 / 100
10 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
2.5%

Melt Flow Rate

2 g/10 min
1 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

210°C410 °F
215°C419 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

40°C104 °F
60°C140 °F

Same in both: Formability (cold) 90 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb
82 MJ/kg35,254 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
2.3 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

85 L/kg10.2 gal/lb
120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

27 kN·m/kg
23 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.3 MN·m/kg
0.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

242 kJ/m³
213 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleLLDPEPEX

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityLLDPEPEX
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

LLDPE vs PEX — frequently asked

Is PEX stronger than LLDPE?

Yes. PEX has a typical yield strength of 17 MPa (2.47 ksi) against 11 MPa (1.6 ksi) for LLDPE — about 55% more. Tensile strength is 22 MPa (3.19 ksi) vs 25 MPa (3.63 ksi).

Which is cheaper, LLDPE or PEX?

LLDPE is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PEX is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, LLDPE or PEX?

LLDPE. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (42/100) for PEX; for welding the order is LLDPE first (excellent, 90/100) then PEX (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in LLDPE and PEX side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.