FabDigitFabDigit

Low-Odor Bio-Based Resin vs Formlabs Tough 2000

Polymer · grade comparison

Low-Odor Bio-Based Resin and Tough 2000 are both polymer grades. Tough 2000 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for Low-Odor Bio-Based Resin, about 11% more. Tough 2000 is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 9% for Low-Odor Bio-Based Resin. Tough 2000 is stiffer (2.4 GPa vs 1.9 GPa) and Low-Odor Bio-Based Resin runs hotter in service (55°C vs 50°C continuous). On the shop floor, Tough 2000 machines more easily (good vs fair) and Tough 2000 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Low-Odor Bio-Based Resin (high, $$$$).

Low-Odor Bio-Based ResinChoose it when the part sees heat.

Tough 2000Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Low-Odor Bio-Based Resin vs Tough 2000: properties

Low-Odor Bio-Based ResinTough 2000

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.9 GPa0.28 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

45 MPa6.5 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

9%
22%

Compressive Strength

78 MPa11.3 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2 GPa0.29 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Flexural Strength

70 MPa10.2 ksi
68 MPa9.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2 GPa0.29 Msi
1.9 GPa0.28 Msi

Shear Strength

35 MPa5.1 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

0.8 MPa·√m0.73 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

25 J/m0.47 ft·lbf/in
38 J/m0.71 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

82 Shore D
80 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

78 HRM
—

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
44 MPa6.4 ksi

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
103 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.6%
0.8%

Same in both: Density 1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³ · Glass Transition (Tg) 58°C136 °F · Water Absorption (Saturation) 1.8% · Refractive Index 1.51

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

90 µm/m·K50 µin/in·°F
110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

55°C131 °F
50°C122 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

56°C133 °F
49°C120 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

47°C117 °F
42°C108 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

80°C176 °F
70°C158 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 19%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
15 kV/mm381 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.5
3.4

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.03 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1%
—

Weldability

—
5 / 100

Formability (cold)

—
10 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb
115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.4 kg CO₂/kg
6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

39 kN·m/kg
43 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.7 MN·m/kg
2.1 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleFormlabs Tough 2000

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityLow-Odor Bio-Based ResinTough 2000
Injection molding—Yes
3D printing—Yes
Default condition—ABS-like
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
Conductive Coating—Yes
Dyeing (Nylon)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Primer Coating—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
Tinted Coating—Yes
UV Coating—Yes
Vacuum Metallization—Yes
Waterproof Coating—Yes

Low-Odor Bio-Based Resin vs Tough 2000 — frequently asked

Is Tough 2000 stronger than Low-Odor Bio-Based Resin?

Yes. Tough 2000 has a typical tensile strength of 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 45 MPa (6.53 ksi) for Low-Odor Bio-Based Resin — about 11% more.

Which is cheaper, Low-Odor Bio-Based Resin or Tough 2000?

Tough 2000 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Low-Odor Bio-Based Resin is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Low-Odor Bio-Based Resin or Tough 2000?

Tough 2000. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (45/100) for Low-Odor Bio-Based Resin.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Low-Odor Bio-Based Resin and Tough 2000 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.