FabDigitFabDigit

Dental Resin vs Formlabs Tough 2000

Polymer · grade comparison

Dental Resin and Tough 2000 are both polymer grades. Dental Resin is the stronger of the two: yield strength 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) against 44 MPa (6.38 ksi) for Tough 2000, about 9% more; tensile strength follows at 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi). In exchange, Tough 2000 is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 6% for Dental Resin, and Dental Resin is harder (85 Shore D vs 80 Shore D). Tough 2000 is stiffer (2.4 GPa vs 2.2 GPa) and Dental Resin runs hotter in service (70°C vs 50°C continuous). On the shop floor, Tough 2000 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Dental Resin (high, $$$$).

Dental ResinChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Tough 2000Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

Dental Resin vs Tough 2000: properties

Dental ResinTough 2000

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.8 GPa0.12 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

3 GPa0.38 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.39

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

48 MPa7 ksi
44 MPa6.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

6%
22%

Compressive Strength

130 MPa18.9 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Flexural Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
68 MPa9.9 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
1.9 GPa0.28 Msi

Shear Strength

40 MPa5.8 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

1.1 MPa·√m1 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

22 J/m0.41 ft·lbf/in
38 J/m0.71 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

85 Shore D
80 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

85 HRM
—

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
103 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.16 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

78°C172 °F
58°C136 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.9%
0.8%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2%
1.8%

Light Transmission

85%
—

Same in both: Refractive Index 1.51

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

100 µm/m·K55.6 µin/in·°F
110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

70°C158 °F
50°C122 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

75°C167 °F
49°C120 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

60°C140 °F
42°C108 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

134°C273 °F
70°C158 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 19%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Dielectric Strength 15 kV/mm381 V/mil · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3.4 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 0.03

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
55 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
10 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
65 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1%
—

Mold Temperature (typ.)

30°C86 °F
—

Same in both: Weldability 5 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb
115 MJ/kg49,441 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

47 kN·m/kg
43 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.9 MN·m/kg
2.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

524 kJ/m³
403 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleFormlabs Tough 2000Dental Resin

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityDental ResinTough 2000
Default conditionStandardABS-like
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both are offered for Injection molding and 3D printing. Both take the same 12 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), Conductive Coating, Dyeing (Nylon), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Primer Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, Tinted Coating, UV Coating, Vacuum Metallization, Waterproof Coating.

Dental Resin vs Tough 2000 — frequently asked

Is Dental Resin stronger than Tough 2000?

Yes. Dental Resin has a typical yield strength of 48 MPa (6.96 ksi) against 44 MPa (6.38 ksi) for Tough 2000 — about 9% more. Tensile strength is 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) vs 50 MPa (7.25 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Dental Resin or Tough 2000?

Tough 2000 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Dental Resin is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Dental Resin or Tough 2000?

Dental Resin, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 60/100 against 55/100 for Tough 2000.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Dental Resin and Tough 2000 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.