FabDigitFabDigit

HMWPE vs LLDPE

Polymer · grade comparison

HMWPE and LLDPE are both polymer grades. HMWPE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 24 MPa (3.48 ksi) against 11 MPa (1.6 ksi) for LLDPE, about 118% more; tensile strength follows at 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) vs 25 MPa (3.63 ksi). HMWPE is harder — 65 Shore D against 50 Shore D for LLDPE — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. LLDPE is lighter (0.92 g/cm³ vs 0.95 g/cm³ for HMWPE) and HMWPE is stiffer (0.95 GPa vs 0.25 GPa). On the shop floor, LLDPE forms better (excellent vs very good).

HMWPEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

LLDPEChoose it when weight is the constraint.

HMWPE vs LLDPE: properties

HMWPELLDPE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.95 GPa0.14 Msi
0.25 GPa0.04 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.35 GPa0.05 Msi
0.09 GPa0.01 Msi

Bulk Modulus

3 GPa0.38 Msi
2 GPa0.29 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.44
0.45

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

30 MPa4.4 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

24 MPa3.5 ksi
11 MPa1.6 ksi

Compressive Strength

22 MPa3.2 ksi
11 MPa1.6 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.9 GPa0.13 Msi
0.25 GPa0.04 Msi

Flexural Strength

26 MPa3.8 ksi
12 MPa1.7 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.1 GPa0.15 Msi
0.28 GPa0.04 Msi

Shear Strength

20 MPa2.9 ksi
15 MPa2.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.8 MPa·√m2.5 ksi·√in
2.5 MPa·√m2.3 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

250 J/m4.7 ft·lbf/in
800 J/m15 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

65 Shore D
50 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

50 HRR
40 HRR

Hardness, Shore A

—
93 Shore A

Same in both: Elongation at Break 700%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.95 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.92 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

133°C271 °F
123°C253 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-120°C-184 °F
-110°C-166 °F

Refractive Index

1.54
1.51

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.01% · Water Absorption (Saturation) 0.02%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.45 W/m·K0.26 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.33 W/m·K0.19 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
2,300 J/kg·K0.55 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

160 µm/m·K88.9 µin/in·°F
180 µm/m·K100 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-70°C-94 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

77°C171 °F
60°C140 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

46°C115 °F
37°C99 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

125°C257 °F
95°C203 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

110°C230 °F
95°C203 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 80°C176 °F · Limiting Oxygen Index 17%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁵ Ω·m3.94×10²² µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

24 kV/mm610 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁷ Ω·cm

Same in both: Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 2.3 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 3×10⁻⁴ · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

93 / 100
90 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

92 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

78 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2.5%
2%

Melt Flow Rate

0.1 g/10 min
2 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

215°C419 °F
210°C410 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

35°C95 °F
40°C104 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.1 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb
85 L/kg10.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

32 kN·m/kg
27 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1 MN·m/kg
0.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

303 kJ/m³
242 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleHMWPELLDPE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityHMWPELLDPE
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

HMWPE vs LLDPE — frequently asked

Is HMWPE stronger than LLDPE?

Yes. HMWPE has a typical yield strength of 24 MPa (3.48 ksi) against 11 MPa (1.6 ksi) for LLDPE — about 118% more. Tensile strength is 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) vs 25 MPa (3.63 ksi).

Which is cheaper, HMWPE or LLDPE?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, HMWPE or LLDPE?

HMWPE, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 62/100 against 55/100 for LLDPE.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in HMWPE and LLDPE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.