FabDigitFabDigit

HMWPE vs LDPE

Polymer · grade comparison

HMWPE and LDPE are both polymer grades. HMWPE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 24 MPa (3.48 ksi) against 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) for LDPE, about 140% more; tensile strength follows at 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) vs 11 MPa (1.6 ksi). HMWPE is the more ductile: elongation 700% versus 450% for LDPE, and HMWPE is harder (65 Shore D vs 47 Shore D). LDPE is lighter (0.92 g/cm³ vs 0.95 g/cm³ for HMWPE) and HMWPE is stiffer (0.95 GPa vs 0.22 GPa). On the shop floor, HMWPE machines more easily (good vs fair).

HMWPEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

LDPEChoose it when weight is the constraint.

HMWPE vs LDPE: properties

HMWPELDPE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.95 GPa0.14 Msi
0.22 GPa0.03 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.35 GPa0.05 Msi
0.08 GPa0.01 Msi

Bulk Modulus

3 GPa0.38 Msi
2 GPa0.26 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.44
0.45

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

30 MPa4.4 ksi
11 MPa1.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

24 MPa3.5 ksi
10 MPa1.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

700%
450%

Compressive Strength

22 MPa3.2 ksi
9 MPa1.3 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.9 GPa0.13 Msi
0.2 GPa0.03 Msi

Flexural Strength

26 MPa3.8 ksi
10 MPa1.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.1 GPa0.15 Msi
0.25 GPa0.04 Msi

Shear Strength

20 MPa2.9 ksi
8 MPa1.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.8 MPa·√m2.5 ksi·√in
1.4 MPa·√m1.3 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

250 J/m4.7 ft·lbf/in
800 J/m15 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

65 Shore D
47 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

50 HRR
—

Hardness, Shore A

—
93 Shore A

Tear Strength

—
55 kN/m314 lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.95 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.92 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

133°C271 °F
110°C230 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-120°C-184 °F
-110°C-166 °F

Refractive Index

1.54
1.51

Light Transmission

—
80%

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.01% · Water Absorption (Saturation) 0.02%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.45 W/m·K0.26 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.33 W/m·K0.19 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
2,100 J/kg·K0.5 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

160 µm/m·K88.9 µin/in·°F
190 µm/m·K106 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

80°C176 °F
70°C158 °F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

77°C171 °F
47°C117 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

46°C115 °F
34°C93 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

125°C257 °F
50°C122 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

17%
18%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

110°C230 °F
90°C194 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

24 kV/mm610 V/mil
25 kV/mm635 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.3
2.28

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 3×10⁻⁴ · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

93 / 100
88 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
20 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
45 / 100

Weldability

92 / 100
95 / 100

Formability (cold)

78 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

0.1 g/10 min
2 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

215°C419 °F
190°C374 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

35°C95 °F
30°C86 °F

Same in both: Mold Shrinkage 2.5%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb
80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb
120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2.1 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

32 kN·m/kg
12 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1 MN·m/kg
0.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

303 kJ/m³
227 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleLDPEHMWPE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityHMWPELDPE
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

HMWPE vs LDPE — frequently asked

Is HMWPE stronger than LDPE?

Yes. HMWPE has a typical yield strength of 24 MPa (3.48 ksi) against 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) for LDPE — about 140% more. Tensile strength is 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) vs 11 MPa (1.6 ksi).

Which is cheaper, HMWPE or LDPE?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, HMWPE or LDPE?

HMWPE. Its machinability rates good (62/100) against fair (45/100) for LDPE.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in HMWPE and LDPE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.