FabDigitFabDigit

EAA vs EVOH

Polymer · grade comparison

EAA and EVOH are both polymer grades. EVOH is the stronger of the two: yield strength 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) for EAA, about 5.8 times as much; tensile strength follows at 68 MPa (9.86 ksi) vs 17 MPa (2.47 ksi). In exchange, EAA is the more ductile: elongation 550% versus 230% for EVOH, and EVOH is harder (78 Shore D vs 48 Shore D). EAA is lighter (0.94 g/cm³ vs 1.19 g/cm³ for EVOH) and EVOH is stiffer (2.9 GPa vs 0.13 GPa). On the shop floor, EVOH machines more easily (good vs fair), EAA welds better (excellent vs good), and EAA sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than EVOH (premium, $$$).

EAAChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

EVOHChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

EAA vs EVOH: properties

EAAEVOH

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.13 GPa0.02 Msi
2.9 GPa0.42 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

17 MPa2.5 ksi
68 MPa9.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

10 MPa1.5 ksi
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

550%
230%

Flexural Modulus

0.15 GPa0.02 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

800 J/m15 ft·lbf/in
45 J/m0.84 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore A

92 Shore A
—

Hardness, Shore D

48 Shore D
78 Shore D

Tear Strength

90 kN/m514 lbf/in
—

Poisson's Ratio

—
0.4

Compressive Strength

—
80 MPa11.6 ksi

Flexural Strength

—
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Shear Strength

—
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
85 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
118 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.94 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
1.19 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

95°C203 °F
183°C361 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-25°C-13 °F
69°C156 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.1%
5.5%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.5%
9%

Refractive Index

1.51
1.53

Light Transmission

88%
91%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.3 W/m·K0.17 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.33 W/m·K0.19 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

2,200 J/kg·K0.53 BTU/lb·°F
2,000 J/kg·K0.48 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

180 µm/m·K100 µin/in·°F
85 µm/m·K47.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

60°C140 °F
90°C194 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

48°C118 °F
160°C320 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

65°C149 °F
168°C334 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
22%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
130°C266 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
68°C154 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

30 kV/mm762 V/mil
—

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.8
4

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.01
—

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹³ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
70 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

92 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

35 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
1%

Melt Flow Rate

8 g/10 min
1.6 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
215°C419 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

30°C86 °F
60°C140 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

82 MJ/kg35,254 BTU/lb
90 MJ/kg38,693 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

100 L/kg12 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

18 kN·m/kg
57 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.1 MN·m/kg
2.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

385 kJ/m³
580 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleEVOHEAA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityEAAEVOH
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

EAA vs EVOH — frequently asked

Is EVOH stronger than EAA?

Yes. EVOH has a typical yield strength of 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) for EAA — about 5.8 times as much. Tensile strength is 68 MPa (9.86 ksi) vs 17 MPa (2.47 ksi).

Which is cheaper, EAA or EVOH?

EAA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while EVOH is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, EAA or EVOH?

EVOH. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (35/100) for EAA; for welding the order is EAA first (excellent, 92/100) then EVOH (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in EAA and EVOH side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.