FabDigitFabDigit

COC vs PEI

Polymer · grade comparison

COC and PEI are both polymer grades. PEI is the stronger of the two: yield strength 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) against 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) for COC, about 75% more; tensile strength follows at 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) vs 63 MPa (9.14 ksi). PEI is the more ductile: elongation 60% versus 5% for COC. COC is lighter (1.02 g/cm³ vs 1.27 g/cm³ for PEI) and PEI runs hotter in service (170°C vs 110°C continuous). On the shop floor, PEI welds better (good vs fair) and COC sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than PEI (specialty, $$$$$).

COCChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when cost is the deciding factor.

PEIChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

COC vs PEI: properties

COCPEI

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.1 GPa0.45 Msi
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.36

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

63 MPa9.1 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
60%

Flexural Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.9 GPa0.42 Msi
3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

21 J/m0.39 ft·lbf/in
53 J/m0.99 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

89 HRM
109 HRM

Shear Modulus

—
1.2 GPa0.17 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
4 GPa0.55 Msi

Compressive Strength

—
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Compressive Modulus

—
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Shear Strength

—
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Hardness, Shore D

—
87 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
125 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.02 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.27 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

138°C280 °F
217°C423 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.01%
0.25%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.01%
1.25%

Refractive Index

1.53
1.66

Light Transmission

91%
78%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.15 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F
1,100 J/kg·K0.26 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F
55 µm/m·K30.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

110°C230 °F
170°C338 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

130°C266 °F
210°C410 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

123°C253 °F
200°C392 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

130°C266 °F
219°C426 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
47%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

130°C266 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁵ Ω·m3.94×10²² µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

45 kV/mm1,143 V/mil
33 kV/mm838 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.35
3.15

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

2×10⁻⁴
0.0013

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁷ Ω·cm

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
175 V

Same in both: Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
85 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

50 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
70 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

12 g/10 min
9 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

270°C518 °F
370°C698 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

110°C230 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Mold Shrinkage 0.6%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb
230 MJ/kg98,882 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.5 kg CO₂/kg
9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

62 kN·m/kg
83 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

3 MN·m/kg
2.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

581 kJ/m³
1,723 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePEICOC

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCOCPEI
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
3D printing—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled (1000)
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
Conductive Coating—Yes
Dyeing (Nylon)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Primer Coating—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
Tinted Coating—Yes
UV Coating—Yes
Vacuum Metallization—Yes
Waterproof Coating—Yes

COC vs PEI — frequently asked

Is PEI stronger than COC?

Yes. PEI has a typical yield strength of 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) against 60 MPa (8.7 ksi) for COC — about 75% more. Tensile strength is 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) vs 63 MPa (9.14 ksi).

Which is cheaper, COC or PEI?

COC is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while PEI is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, COC or PEI?

PEI, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 60/100 for COC; for welding the order is PEI first (good, 60/100) then COC (fair, 50/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in COC and PEI side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.