FabDigitFabDigit

PC vs PEI

Polymer · grade comparison

PC and PEI are both polymer grades. PEI is the stronger of the two: yield strength 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) against 63 MPa (9.14 ksi) for PC, about 67% more; tensile strength follows at 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) vs 68 MPa (9.86 ksi). In exchange, PC is the more ductile: elongation 110% versus 60% for PEI. PC is lighter (1.2 g/cm³ vs 1.27 g/cm³ for PEI) and PEI is stiffer (3.2 GPa vs 2.4 GPa). On the shop floor, PC welds better (very good vs good) and PC sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PEI (specialty, $$$$$).

PCChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PEIChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PC vs PEI: properties

PCPEI

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.4 GPa0.34 Msi
3.2 GPa0.46 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.83 GPa0.12 Msi
1.2 GPa0.17 Msi

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.51 Msi
4 GPa0.55 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.36

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

68 MPa9.9 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

63 MPa9.1 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

110%
60%

Compressive Strength

80 MPa11.6 ksi
140 MPa20.3 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.4 GPa0.35 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Flexural Strength

97 MPa14.1 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.4 GPa0.34 Msi
3.3 GPa0.48 Msi

Shear Strength

41 MPa5.9 ksi
85 MPa12.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.2 MPa·√m2 ksi·√in
3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

800 J/m15 ft·lbf/in
53 J/m0.99 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

84 Shore D
87 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

70 HRM
109 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

120 HRR
125 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.2 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.27 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

147°C297 °F
217°C423 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.15%
0.25%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.35%
1.25%

Refractive Index

1.585
1.66

Light Transmission

88%
78%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F
1,100 J/kg·K0.26 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

67 µm/m·K37.2 µin/in·°F
55 µm/m·K30.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
170°C338 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

138°C280 °F
210°C410 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

129°C264 °F
200°C392 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

146°C295 °F
219°C426 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

26%
47%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

145°C293 °F
200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁵ Ω·m3.94×10²² µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
33 kV/mm838 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.9
3.15

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.01
0.0013

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁷ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

250 V
175 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
85 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
70 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

10 g/10 min
9 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

295°C563 °F
370°C698 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

90°C194 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Machinability 65 / 100 · Mold Shrinkage 0.6%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb
230 MJ/kg98,882 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.3 kg CO₂/kg
9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

57 kN·m/kg
83 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2 MN·m/kg
2.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

844 kJ/m³
1,723 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.1 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePCPEI

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPCPEI
Default conditionUnfilledUnfilled (1000)
Relative cost$ Budget$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal, Injection molding and 3D printing. Both take the same 12 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), Conductive Coating, Dyeing (Nylon), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Primer Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, Tinted Coating, UV Coating, Vacuum Metallization, Waterproof Coating.

PC vs PEI — frequently asked

Is PEI stronger than PC?

Yes. PEI has a typical yield strength of 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) against 63 MPa (9.14 ksi) for PC — about 67% more. Tensile strength is 105 MPa (15.2 ksi) vs 68 MPa (9.86 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PC or PEI?

PC is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PEI is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, PC or PEI?

PC. Its weldability rates very good (70/100) against good (60/100) for PEI.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PC and PEI side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.