FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy CW-12MW vs MAR-M247

Nickel Alloy · grade comparison

Nickel Alloy CW-12MW and MAR-M247 are both nickel alloy grades. MAR-M247 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 815 MPa (118 ksi) against 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) for CW-12MW, about 133% more; tensile strength follows at 965 MPa (140 ksi) vs 550 MPa (79.8 ksi). In exchange, CW-12MW is the more ductile: elongation 10% versus 7% for MAR-M247, and MAR-M247 is harder (390 HB vs 200 HB). MAR-M247 is lighter (8.54 g/cm³ vs 8.94 g/cm³ for CW-12MW) and MAR-M247 runs hotter in service (1,000°C vs 650°C continuous). On the shop floor, CW-12MW machines more easily (poor vs not recommended) and CW-12MW welds better (good vs not recommended).

CW-12MWChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

MAR-M247Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

CW-12MW vs MAR-M247: properties

CW-12MWMAR-M247

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

78 GPa11.3 Msi
79 GPa11.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

180 GPa26.1 Msi
165 GPa23.9 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.31
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
965 MPa140 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
815 MPa118 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
7%

Reduction in Area

12%
8%

Shear Strength

385 MPa55.8 ksi
630 MPa91.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

220 MPa31.9 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

70 J51.6 ft·lbf
12 J8.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

200 HB
390 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

94 HRB
—

Hardness, Rockwell C

15 HRC
42 HRC

Compressive Strength

—
900 MPa131 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

—
420 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 205 GPa29.7 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.94 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.54 g/cm³0.31 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,275°C2,327 °F
1,315°C2,399 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,355°C2,471 °F
1,382°C2,520 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

10.2 W/m·K5.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
9.8 W/m·K5.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

385 J/kg·K0.09 BTU/lb·°F
420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.3 µm/m·K6.3 µin/in·°F
11.8 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

650°C1,202 °F
1,000°C1,832 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 290 J/g125 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.3 % IACS
1.4 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.3×10⁻⁶ Ω·m51.2 µΩ·in
1.25×10⁻⁶ Ω·m49.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.08 V
-0.15 V

Corrosion Resistance

86 / 100
68 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

22 / 100
10 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

12%
7%

Weldability

55 / 100
10 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
3 / 100

Castability

60 / 100
72 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

150 MJ/kg64,488 BTU/lb
230 MJ/kg98,882 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
14 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
1,500 L/kg180 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

62 kN·m/kg
113 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

22.9 MN·m/kg
24 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

299 kJ/m³
1,620 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3 mm²/s
2.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

2
4

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every nickel alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0006.577.588.59Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCW-12MWMAR-M247

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCW-12MWMAR-M247
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 3 finishes: Gold Plating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

CW-12MW vs MAR-M247 — frequently asked

Is MAR-M247 stronger than CW-12MW?

Yes. MAR-M247 has a typical yield strength of 815 MPa (118 ksi) against 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) for CW-12MW — about 133% more. Tensile strength is 965 MPa (140 ksi) vs 550 MPa (79.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CW-12MW or MAR-M247?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, CW-12MW or MAR-M247?

CW-12MW. Its machinability rates poor (22/100) against not recommended (10/100) for MAR-M247; for welding the order is CW-12MW first (good, 55/100) then MAR-M247 (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CW-12MW and MAR-M247 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.